Publication: SPOR KULÜBÜ VE ANTRENÖR ARASINDAKİ SÖZLEŞMENİN HUKUKİ NİTELİĞİ VE ANA ESASLARI
Abstract
Spor sektöründe kişilerin yaptıkları sözleşmelerden kaynaklanan uyuşmazlıklarla sık sık karşılaşılmaktadır. Antrenörlerin spor kulüpleriy-le yaptığı iş sözleşmeleri de bu uyuşmazlık konularından biridir. Bazı spor federasyonlarının bu sözleşmeyle ilgili detaylı düzenlemeleri var-ken çoğu federasyonun ayrı bir düzenlemesi bulunmamaktadır. Antre-nörlerin de sporcu gibi değerlendirilip İş Kanunu kapsamı dışında kala-cağı düşünülebilir. Hukukumuzda İş Kanunu’na tabi olmakla Türk Borç-lar Kanunu’na tabi olmanın sonuçları farklıdır. Çalışmamızda bu söz-leşmenin tarafları, niteliği, unsurları, benzer diğer sözleşmelerden farkla-rı, tabi olduğu mevzuat, şekli, içeriği, süresi ve spor federasyonuna tesci-li ile ilişkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, spor kulübü ile antrenör arasındaki sözleşmenin bir iş sözleşmesi olduğu, İş Kanunu’na tabi ol-duğu, yazılı olarak yapıldığı, belirli süreli olarak yapılabileceği ve söz-leşmenin ilgili spor federasyonuna tescilinin kurucu değil bildirici etkisi olduğu kanaatine varılmıştır.
Disputes arising from contracts made by individuals in sports sec-tor are frequently encountered. Coaches' agreements with clubs are also one of them. While some sports federations have detailed regulations on this contract, most federations do not have specific regulations. Coaches can also be considered as athletes and considered to be out of the scope of the Labor Act. In our law system, the consequences of being subject to the Labor Act and being subject to the Turkish Code of Obligations are different. In this study, we evaluated this contract regarding to parties, the legal nature, structural elements, the differences from the similar agreements, the legislation, the modality, the content, the duration and the relationship with the registration to the sports federation. As a cons-lusion, the contract between the sports club and the coach is a labor contract, is subject to the Labor Law, shall be in written form, can be concluded for a certain period of time and the registration of the contract to the relevant sports federation is a notifying effect not a founding effect.
Disputes arising from contracts made by individuals in sports sec-tor are frequently encountered. Coaches' agreements with clubs are also one of them. While some sports federations have detailed regulations on this contract, most federations do not have specific regulations. Coaches can also be considered as athletes and considered to be out of the scope of the Labor Act. In our law system, the consequences of being subject to the Labor Act and being subject to the Turkish Code of Obligations are different. In this study, we evaluated this contract regarding to parties, the legal nature, structural elements, the differences from the similar agreements, the legislation, the modality, the content, the duration and the relationship with the registration to the sports federation. As a cons-lusion, the contract between the sports club and the coach is a labor contract, is subject to the Labor Law, shall be in written form, can be concluded for a certain period of time and the registration of the contract to the relevant sports federation is a notifying effect not a founding effect.