Publication:
Adherence of Candida albicans to denture base acrylics and silicone-based resilient liner materials with different surface finishes

dc.contributor.authorKADİR, TANJU
dc.contributor.authorÖZKAN, YASEMİN
dc.contributor.authorsNevzatoglu, Erdem U.; Ozcan, Mutlu; Kulak-Ozkan, Yasemin; Kadir, Tanju
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:32:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:25:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:32:49Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the surface roughness and Candida albicans adherence on denture base acrylic resins and silicone-based resilient liners with different surface finishes. Four commercial denture base acrylic resins ( three heat polymerized and one room temperature polymerized) and five silicone-based liner materials ( two heat polymerized and three room temperature polymerized) ( 10 x 10 x 2 mm) were tested in this study. The materials were processed against glass or plaster or finished with a tungsten carbide bur. Surface roughness measurements were made using a profilometer with an optical scanner probe. All specimens were ultrasonically cleaned in water for 15 s, autoclave sterilized, and contaminated with C. albicans solution for adherence assay evaluation. The materials processed against the glass surface showed significantly lower surface roughness values (0.11 +/- 0.1-1.66 +/- 1.1 mu m) than those of the materials processed against the dental plaster (2.61 +/- 0.2 6.12 +/- 2.8 mu m) or roughening with a bur (1.48 +/- 0.2 - 7.05 +/- 1.2 mu m; p < 0.05, one- or two-way analysis of variance). Also, the materials processed against the glass surface showed lower C. albicans adhesion ( mean ranks 120.36) than those of the materials processed against the dental plaster ( mean ranks 139.77) or roughening with a bur ( mean ranks 143.06), but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05, Kruskal - Wallis and Mann - Whitney). In all types of surface finishes, C. albicans adhesion on denture base acrylics was significantly less ( mean ranks 90.18 90.40) than those of silicone liners (mean ranks 119.38 205.18; p < 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis).
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-007-0106-3
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.pubmed17333305
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/228697
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000248607200009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCandida albicans
dc.subjectdenture resin
dc.subjectresilient liner
dc.subjectstomatitis
dc.subjectsurface roughness
dc.subjectSOFT LINING MATERIALS
dc.subjectADHESION
dc.subjectINVITRO
dc.subjectGROWTH
dc.subjectSTOMATITIS
dc.subjectROUGHNESS
dc.subjectPELLICLES
dc.subjectINVIVO
dc.subjectSALIVA
dc.subjectSERUM
dc.titleAdherence of Candida albicans to denture base acrylics and silicone-based resilient liner materials with different surface finishes
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage236
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage231
oaire.citation.titleCLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
oaire.citation.volume11

Files