Publication:
A COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT RAPID PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUES FROM THE POINT OF ROOT RESORPTION

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorsERVERDI, N; OKAR, I; KUCUKKELES, N; ARBAK, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T16:55:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T07:59:30Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T16:55:50Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this investigation is to compare Haas and Cast Cap Splint devices from the point of root resorption. The material comprised thirty-eight upper and twelve lower premolar teeth derived from nineteen patients who required RME and subsequent removal of the first premolars as part of their full banded orthodontic treatment. Root resorption and repair areas were observed on the buccal surfaces of premolars. Repair tissue was cellular cementum in both groups. There was no significant difference between these two techniques from the point of root resorption amount.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70020-6
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/226569
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1994NW52000006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
dc.relation.ispartofAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.titleA COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT RAPID PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUES FROM THE POINT OF ROOT RESORPTION
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage51
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage47
oaire.citation.titleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
oaire.citation.volume106

Files

Collections

Araştırma Çıktıları