Publication:
Evaluating the Effect of Ambient and Scanning Lights on the Trueness of the Intraoral Scanner

dc.contributor.authorKAHRAMANOĞLU, ERKUT
dc.contributor.authorsKoseoglu, Merve; Kahramanoglu, Erkut; Akin, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:56:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T08:02:56Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:56:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose To determine the influence of different scanning and ambient light conditions on the trueness values of an intraoral scanning (IOS) device. Material and methods The present study was conducted among 20 complete dentate volunteers. After making complete maxillary arch impressions with vinyl polysiloxane material, type IV dental stone was poured, and working casts were obtained. Then, the models were digitized using a dental laboratory scanner (LS) and standard tessellation language (STL) files were acquired. Full arch digital scans of the volunteers were also performed using an IOS device with 2 ambient light conditions (RL: room light, 1003 lux, and ZL: zero light, 0 lux) and 2 scanning light modes (blue [B] and white [W]). Twenty digital scans per group at each light condition were consecutively obtained. Discrepancy between the digital scans and digitized working casts was analyzed using a 3D inspection software. The obtained data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (alpha = 0.05). Results Significant differences were obtained among different light conditions for the IOS device (p < 0.0001, F = 42.958 for positive deviations and F = 29.278, for negative deviations). The room light and blue mode (RLB) condition had the lowest deviation values compared with the other light conditions, followed by room light and white mode (RLW), zero light and blue mode (ZLB), and zero light and white mode (ZLW; p = 0.008, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion Lighting conditions are effective in assessing the trueness of the digital impressions made with an IOS device. RLB conditions are recommended for taking a digital impression.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13341
dc.identifier.eissn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.pubmed33533100
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/236890
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000621093700001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectIntraoral scanners
dc.subjecttrueness
dc.subjectinfluencing accuracy factors
dc.titleEvaluating the Effect of Ambient and Scanning Lights on the Trueness of the Intraoral Scanner
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage816
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage811
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY
oaire.citation.volume30

Files