Publication:
Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA injection in patients with refractory overactive bladder: First multicentric study in Turkish population

dc.contributor.authorONUR, AHMET RAHMİ
dc.contributor.authorsOnem, Kadir; Bayrak, Omer; Demirtas, Abdullah; Coskun, Burhan; Dincer, Murat; Kocak, Izzet; Onur, Rahmi
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:27:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T17:29:38Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:27:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractAimsTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) injection in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to antimuscarinic treatment. MethodsA total of 80 patients with OAB symptoms were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study and received 100U intradetrusor onaBoNT-A injection.The changes from baseline in the frequency of voiding, urge urinary incontinence (UI) and urge episodes, mean and maximum bladder capacities, uroflowmetry, post-void residual urine volume (PVR), quality of life score, and treatment benefit scale score were assessed. The need for a second injection,and treatment-related adverse events were also examined postoperatively. ResultsOnaBoNT-A injection significantly decreased the UI episodes(P=0.0001), the mean voiding frequency (P=0.0001), and the urgency episodes (P=0.0001) in the third month compared to baseline. Similarly, the mean bladder capacity, and maximal bladder capacity were increased (P<0,05). The quality of life scores improved by 57.1% compared to the pre-treatment rate (P=0,0001). No significant change was observed in the PVR or maximum flow rate. Urinary retention developed in 3 (3.75%) patients and urinary infection and transient hematuria were observed in five patients (6.25%) each. The UI episodes, voiding frequency and urgency episodes were significantly lower at the 9th month than at baseline (all P=0.0001). Overall 67% of the patients continued to experience benefits from the injection. Sixteen patients (20%) required a second injection in the third month. Eight patients were lost to follow-up at the last visit in the 9th month, and 34 of the remaining 56 patients required a second injection at the 9th month. Cumulatively, 50 (63%) patients needed re-injections. ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that the onaBoNT-A injection produced significant improvement in all OAB symptoms with a low incidence of treatment related adverse events.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.23286
dc.identifier.eissn1520-6777
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.pubmed28407394
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/235236
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000423411800032
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofNEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectonabotulinumtoxinA
dc.subjectoveractive bladder
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjecturinary incontinence
dc.subjectFEMALE URINARY-INCONTINENCE
dc.subjectDETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY
dc.subjectRISK-FACTORS
dc.subjectPREVALENCE
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA injection in patients with refractory overactive bladder: First multicentric study in Turkish population
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage268
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage263
oaire.citation.titleNEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS
oaire.citation.volume37

Files