Publication:
Aortic elasticity and the influence of valve morphology in children with bicuspid aortic valve

dc.contributor.authorsErolu, Elif; Akalin, Figen; Cetiner, Nilufer; Saylan, Berna C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:24:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T16:46:56Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractAim: We investigated dimensions and elasticity of whole aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and influence of valve phenotype. Method: The study group included 44 patients and 42 controls. Patients were divided into groups according to the type of valve opening as horizontal - fusion between right and left coronary cusps - and vertical - fusion between right-non-coronary cusps; according to age they were divided into younger (5-10 years) and older patients (11-16 years). Our study did not include valve phenotype with fusion between left and non-coronary cusps. Systolic-diastolic diameters of aortic annulus, sinus valsalva, sinutubular junction, arcus, and ascending-descending and abdominal aorta were measured and z-scores were obtained. Aortic strain, distensibility, and stiffness index were calculated. Flow-mediated dilatation of brachial artery was studied. Results: z-Scores at annulus, sinus valsalva, sinutubular junction, and ascending aorta were higher in study patients (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, respectively). z-Scores of sinus valsalva and sinotubular junction were higher in the horizontal group than in the vertical group (p = 0.006, p = 0.023, respectively). z-Score was over +2 in 51% of patients with horizontal morphology and 33% of patients with vertical morphology (p = 0.0001). Ascending aorta was more distensible and less stiff in the study group (11.3 +/- 5.63 versus 7.91 +/- 4.5, p = 0.002; 4.76 +/- 3.60 versus 6.19 +/- 3.44 cm(2).dyn(-1).10(-6) p = 0.033, respectively). Stiffness index of ascending, arcus, and abdominal aorta were higher in the horizontal group (p = 0.004, p = 0.038, p = 0.006, respectively). Ascending aorta was more distensible and less stiff in the younger group (p = 0.007, p = 0.027, respectively) but did not differ in the older group compared with the control group. Conclusion: Aortic dimensions arc enlarged in patients with bicuspid aortic valve starting from childhood, suggesting the presence of generalised aortopathy. Aortic elasticity is increased at young age and decreased with age.
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1047951118001348
dc.identifier.eissn1467-1107
dc.identifier.issn1047-9511
dc.identifier.pubmed30079852
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/234724
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000448110300010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
dc.relation.ispartofCARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBicuspid aortic valve
dc.subjectchildren
dc.subjectaortic distensibility
dc.subjectaortic stiffness
dc.subjectflow mediated dilatation
dc.subject22Q11.2 DELETION SYNDROME
dc.subjectASCENDING AORTA
dc.subjectDILATED AORTA
dc.subjectROOT DILATION
dc.subjectENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION
dc.subjectCELL CHANGES
dc.subjectDILATATION
dc.subjectDISEASE
dc.subjectPHENOTYPE
dc.subjectAORTOPATHY
dc.titleAortic elasticity and the influence of valve morphology in children with bicuspid aortic valve
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1344
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage1338
oaire.citation.titleCARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG
oaire.citation.volume28

Files