Publication: Exploring the Relationships Between Science and Technology Input and Output Indicators: A Comparison Between Developed, Fast Developing World and Turkey
| dc.contributor.authors | Yildirim, Hakan; Yildirim, Nihan | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Kocaoglu, DF | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Anderson, TR | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Daim, TU | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Kozanoglu, DC | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Niwa, K | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Perman, G | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-12T16:14:39Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-11T10:29:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-12T16:14:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.description.abstract | From a scientometric perspective, this paper aims to discuss the relationships between the financial Science and Technology input indicators like R&D Expenditures and Payments for external technology transfer (royalties and License fees) to the Science and Technology output indicators like Patents/patent applications and receipts from technology transfer (Royalties and licence fees). Although the efficiency of R&D and economical returns of R&D spendings has always been questioned and searched by the scholars from developmental economics, scientometrics and technology and innovation management fields, the performance of developing countries for utilizing R&D investments is still worth searching. In this study, we explored the trends of and relationships between Science and Technology Input indicators like R&D expenditure, Payments (royalties and License fees) and Science and Technology output indicators like Patents/patent applications and receipts from technology transfer (Royalties and licence fees) for developed countries that are called as G-7 countries, fast developing countries that are called as BRIC (Brazil, Russian federation, India and China) and Turkey. Based on the data of World Bank, S&T input and output indicators are analyzed by calculating the spatial-index of each country for each indicator between the years of 1996-2010 where data of all countries are available. Indicators are tested for their correlations. The differences between G-8, BRIC countries and Turkey are also outlined. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | doiWOS:000353636300018 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-890843-29-8 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2159-5100 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/225429 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000353636300018 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | IEEE | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 2014 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (PICMET) | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | GROWTH | |
| dc.title | Exploring the Relationships Between Science and Technology Input and Output Indicators: A Comparison Between Developed, Fast Developing World and Turkey | |
| dc.type | conferenceObject | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 163 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 155 | |
| oaire.citation.title | 2014 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (PICMET) |
