Publication:
Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned With the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test

dc.contributor.authorAKGÜN ÖLMEZ, SEVCAN GÜL
dc.contributor.authorsStephens, Martin L.; Akgun-Olmez, Sevcan Gul; Hoffmann, Sebastian; de Vries, Rob; Flick, Burkhard; Hartung, Thomas; Lalu, Manoj; Maertens, Alexandra; Witters, Hilda; Wright, Robert; Tsaioun, Katya
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T11:39:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T17:03:52Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T11:39:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.description.abstractSystematic review methodology is a means of addressing specific questions through structured, consistent, and transparent examinations of the relevant scientific evidence. Thismethodology has been used to advantage in clinical medicine, and is being adapted for use in other disciplines. Although some applications to toxicology have been explored, especially for hazard identification, the present preparatory study is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to adapt it to the assessment of toxicological test methods. As our test case, we chose the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental toxicity and its mammalian counterpart, the standard mammalian prenatal development toxicity study, focusing the review on how well the ZET predicts the presence or absence of chemical-induced prenatal developmental toxicity observed in mammalian studies. An interdisciplinary team prepared a systematic review protocol and adjusted it throughout this piloting phase, where needed. The final protocol was registered and will guide the main study (systematic review), which will execute the protocol to comprehensively answer the review question. The goal of this preparatory study was to translate systematic review methodology to the assessment of toxicological test method performance. Consequently, it focused on the methodological issues encountered, whereas the main study will report substantive findings. These relate to numerous systematic review steps, but primarily to searching and selecting the evidence. Applying the lessons learned to these challenges can improve not only our main study, but may also be helpful to others seeking to use systematic review methodology to compare toxicological test methods. We conclude with a series of recommendations that, if adopted, would help improve the quality of the published literature, and make conducting systematic reviews of toxicological studies faster and easier over time.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/toxsci/kfz128
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0929
dc.identifier.issn1096-6080
dc.identifier.pubmed31192353
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/219838
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000493388700005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.relation.ispartofTOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjecttest method comparison
dc.subjectzebrafish embryotoxicity test
dc.subjectprenatal developmental toxicity
dc.subjectmalformations
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH SCIENCE
dc.subjectEVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
dc.subjectDEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
dc.subjectREPORTING QUALITY
dc.subjectTHALIDOMIDE
dc.subjectTOXICITY
dc.subjectVALIDATION
dc.subjectHARMONIZATION
dc.subjectMETAANALYSIS
dc.subjectTERMINOLOGY
dc.titleAdaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned With the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test
dc.typereview
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage68
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage56
oaire.citation.titleTOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
oaire.citation.volume171

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
345.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format