Publication:
Diagnostic utilities of tracheal ultrasound and USB-endoscope for the confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A cadaver study

dc.contributor.authorDENİZBAŞI ALTINOK, ARZU
dc.contributor.authorSANRI, ERKMAN
dc.contributor.authorAKOĞLU, HALDUN
dc.contributor.authorKARACABEY, SİNAN
dc.contributor.authorŞEHİRLİ, ÜMİT SÜLEYMAN
dc.contributor.authorVERİMLİ, URAL
dc.contributor.authorsSanri, Erkman; Akoglu, Ebru Unal; Karacabey, Sinan; Verimli, Ural; Akoglu, Haldun; Sehirli, Umit; Denizbasi, Arzu
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:26:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T13:19:34Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:26:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Confirmation of the endotracheal tube placement (CoETP) has the utmost importance in the management of an airway. Visualization of tracheal rings or carina with a fiber-optical bronchoscope (FOB) has considered to be a reliable method for the CoETP. However, FOB is expensive, time-consuming, and not always practical. Inexpensive endoscopic USB-cameras were shown to aid intubation successfully and reliably. On the other hand, there have been no studies investigating their use for the CoETP. Tracheal ultrasonography (TUS) is also a new, inexpensive and widely available alternative. A cadaver study has planned to evaluate the diagnostic utility of TUS and a USB-camera. Methods: This study was conducted in the Anatomy Lab of a University on a fresh frozen female cadaver. Three senior Emergency Physicians have intubated the cadaver, and performed TUS or USB-endoscopy. We have prepared a randomized intubation list (n = 96) in three blocks (3 times 32) as to include equal number of esophageal and tracheal intubations (48 for each). Each EP is performed all three interventions (intubation, TUS and USB-endoscopy) in consecutive blocks of 32 intubations, in turn. The position of the tube has been verified from a 2 cm wide ostium on the proximal trachea. Results: In this study, all intubations (n = 96, 100%) were correctly identified as tracheal or esophageal with both TUS and USB-camera. Both the sensitivity and specificity of TUS and USB-endoscopy for the CoETP were 100.0%. Conclusion: The perfect accuracy of TUS and USB-endoscopy, have placed those techniques in a unique position as an alternative in resource-poor situations. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.015
dc.identifier.eissn1532-8171
dc.identifier.issn0735-6757
dc.identifier.pubmed29477268
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/235049
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000447152300003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
dc.relation.ispartofAMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEndotracheal intubation
dc.subjectCadaver
dc.subjectTracheal ultrasonography
dc.subjectFiberoptic bronchoscopy
dc.subjectBorescope
dc.subjectUSA-endoscopy
dc.subjectEMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT
dc.subjectINTUBATION
dc.subjectPOSITION
dc.subjectULTRASONOGRAPHY
dc.subjectVERIFICATION
dc.subjectMETAANALYSIS
dc.titleDiagnostic utilities of tracheal ultrasound and USB-endoscope for the confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A cadaver study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1946
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage1943
oaire.citation.titleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
oaire.citation.volume36

Files