Publication:
Food immunotherapy practice: Nation differences across Europe, The FIND project

dc.contributor.authorAYDINER, ELİF
dc.contributor.authorsRodriguez del Rio, Pablo; Alvarez-Perea, Alberto; Blumchen, Katharina; Caimmi, Davide; Christoph Caubet, Jean; Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, Anastasios; Riggioni, Carmen; Fassio, Filippo; Karakoc-Aydiner, Elif; Thuy May Le; Patel, Nandinee; Savolainen, Johannes; Vazquez-Ortiz, Marta; Alvaro Lozano, Montserrat
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:59:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T19:11:02Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:59:20Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Food allergen immunotherapy (FA-AIT) practice is known to vary globally. This project aims to identify and characterize European centres performing FA-AIT. Methods An EAACI task force conducted an online survey to gather relevant information regarding FA-AIT practice and setting-specific resources after reviewing the published literature and congress abstracts throughout Europe. Results We identified 102 FA-AIT centres in 18 countries; only Spain (n = 39) and France (n = 16) had >= 10 such centres. Overall, most facilities were hospital-based (77.5%), publicly funded (80.4%) and delivered FA-AIT as routine clinical care (80.4%). On average, departments had 3 allergists/paediatric allergists and 2 nurses. Surveyed centres had provided FA-AIT for a median of 9 years [1-24] to a median of 105 [5-2415] patients. The estimated total number of treated patients was 24875, of whom 41.3% received AIT for milk, 34.2% egg, 12.8% peanut and 11.7% other foods. Anaphylaxis to AIT doses requiring over 4-6 h of observation was reported by 70.6% of centres, ICU admissions by 10.8% and eosinophilic esophagitis by 45.1%. Quality of life and sustained unresponsiveness were evaluated in 20.6% and 54.9% of centres, respectively. The main contraindications for food AIT were severe asthma (57%-63%), eosinophilic esophagitis (56%-48%) and age below 5 years (47%-41%). Conclusions In Europe, FA-AIT is provided mostly in clinical practice. Significant variation is seen in the number of centres per country, facility characteristics and inclusion/exclusion criteria, and in certain aspects of protocols. Potential inequality in access to AIT has been identified as well as the need for education and guidance for treatment standardization.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/all.15016
dc.identifier.eissn1398-9995
dc.identifier.issn0105-4538
dc.identifier.pubmed34289131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/237300
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000680499300001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofALLERGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectallergy
dc.subjectegg
dc.subjectfood immunotherapy
dc.subjectmilk
dc.subjectpeanut
dc.subjectORAL IMMUNOTHERAPY
dc.subjectALLERGEN IMMUNOTHERAPY
dc.subjectPEANUT ALLERGY
dc.subjectCHILDREN
dc.subjectDESENSITIZATION
dc.subjectMILK
dc.subjectCONTRAINDICATIONS
dc.subjectGUIDELINES
dc.subjectEFFICACY
dc.subjectREADY
dc.titleFood immunotherapy practice: Nation differences across Europe, The FIND project
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.titleALLERGY

Files