Publication:
Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy

dc.contributor.authorÇETİNEL, ŞULE
dc.contributor.authorsBalikoglu-Yilmaz, Melike; Yilmaz, Tolga; Cetinel, Sule; Taskin, Umit; Esen, Ayse Banu; Taskapili, Muhittin; Kose, Timur
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-13T12:45:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T16:09:36Z
dc.date.available2022-03-13T12:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare bacterial biofilm colonization in lacrimal stents following external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX DCR), endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) with multidiode laser. METHODS: This prospective study included 30 consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent EXT-, EN-, or TC-DCR. Thirty removed lacrimal stent fragments and conjunctival samples were cultured. The lacrimal stent biofilms were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: ElevEN-(36.7%) of the 30 lacrimal stent cultures were positive for aerobic bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus spia'arrniokS and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However anaerobic bacteria and fungi were not identified in the lacrimal stent cultures. Twenty sevEN-(90%) patients had biofilm positive lacrimal stents. The conjunctival culture positivity after the DCR, biofilm positivity on stents, the grade of biofilm colonization, and the presence of mucus and coccoid and rod shaped organisms did not significantly differ betweEN-any of the groups (P>0.05). However, a significant difference was found whEN-the SEM results were compared to the results of the lacrimal stent and conjunctival cultures (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Type of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery did not affect the biofilm colonization of the lacrimal stents. SEM also appears to be more precise than microbiological culture for evaluating the presence of biofilms on lacrimal stents.
dc.identifier.doi10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27
dc.identifier.eissn2227-4898
dc.identifier.issn2222-3959
dc.identifier.pubmed24967205
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/237869
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000337658400027
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIJO PRESS
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectbiofilms
dc.subjectnasolacrimal duct obstruction
dc.subjectepiphora
dc.subjectdacryocystitis
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectCLINICALLY NONINFECTED EYES
dc.subjectBACTERIAL BIOFILMS
dc.subjectMICROBIAL-GROWTH
dc.subjectRUTHENIUM RED
dc.subjectIN-VITRO
dc.subjectENDOPHTHALMITIS
dc.subjectINFECTIONS
dc.subjectKERATITIS
dc.subjectSURFACES
dc.subjectEPIPHORA
dc.titleComparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage540
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage534
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume7

Files