Publication:
Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing among older adults: A comparison of the Beers 2012 and Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria version 2

dc.contributor.authorTUFAN ÇİNÇİN, ASLI
dc.contributor.authorsBahat, Gulistan; Bay, Ilker; Tufan, Asli; Tufan, Fatih; Kilic, Cihan; Karan, Mehmet Akif
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T20:32:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T06:37:24Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T20:32:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAimTo date, there is no study comparing the Beers 2012 and Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) version 2 criteria, nor reporting a comparison of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate Prescribing (PIM) with STOPP version 2. We aimed to evaluate the prescriptions of patients admitted to a geriatric outpatient clinic with these tools, and to document the factors related to PIM use. MethodsOlder patients (aged 65 years) admitted to the outpatient clinic of a university hospital were retrospectively evaluated for PIM with Beers 2012 and STOPP version 2 criteria. Age; sex; chronic disease and number of drugs; and functional, depression and nutritional statuses were studied with regression analysis as possible factors related to PIM. ResultsThe study included 667 participants (63.1% women, mean age 77.6 6.3 years). The mean number of drugs was 6.1 +/- 3.4. PIM prevalence detected by STOPP version 2 was higher than that of the Beers 2012 criteria (39.1% vs 33.3%, respectively; P < 0.001; Z = -3.5) with moderate agreement in between (kappa = 0.44). Antipsychotics, over-the-counter vitamin/supplements, aspirin, selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors and anticholinergics were the leading drug classes for PIM. The extent of polypharmacy (P < 0.001, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.20-1.38) was the most important variable related to PIM, along with the multiple comorbidities (P = 0.005, OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.30). Higher level of functionality was inversely associated with PIM (P = 0.009, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97). ConclusionsInappropriate prescription prevalence of similar to 40% by STOPP version 2 was similar to the global worldwide prevalence - yet at the upper end. STOPP version 2 was more successful than Beers 2012 to detect PIM. Patients with multiple drug use, multiple comorbidities and more dependency were more likely to have PIM requiring special attention during prescription. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1245-1251.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ggi.12850
dc.identifier.eissn1447-0594
dc.identifier.issn1444-1586
dc.identifier.pubmed27506478
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/234446
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000412071800001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofGERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBeers 2012
dc.subjectcomparison
dc.subjectpotentially inappropriate prescribing
dc.subjectScreening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions version 2
dc.subjectADVERSE DRUG EVENTS
dc.subjectELDERLY-PATIENTS
dc.subjectSTOPP CRITERIA
dc.subjectALERT DOCTORS
dc.subjectMEDICATIONS
dc.subjectPOLYPHARMACY
dc.subjectRISK
dc.titlePrevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing among older adults: A comparison of the Beers 2012 and Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria version 2
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1251
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage1245
oaire.citation.titleGERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
oaire.citation.volume17

Files