Publication:
The Circuitous Nature of Operation Ajax

dc.contributor.authorsIsraeli, Ofer
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T18:07:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T08:25:54Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T18:07:49Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractIn seeking to protect its economic interests and its control of oil resources in Iran, Britain planned to overthrow Iranian Prime Minister Dr Mohammad Mossadegh in a military coup d'etat following his decision to nationalize the Iranian oil industry in 1951. However, the British initially faced strong opposition to this plan from the US under the Truman administration, which preferred a more diplomatic approach to the crisis and did not see British interests as being in line with its own. Facing this opposition and after unsuccessful attempts to oust the Iranian leader through economic pressure and propaganda campaigns, the British skillfully leveraged American fear of Communism to secure Washington, under the Eisenhower Administration, as a partner to lead a joint US-UK mission to overthrow Mossadegh. This paper explores the reasons behind the shift in American policy regarding this issue, exploring whether it was the Brit's successful use of covert, circuitous tactics to achieve their intended outcomes or solely a result of ideological differences between the two US administrations
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00263206.2012.759108
dc.identifier.eissn1743-7881
dc.identifier.issn0026-3206
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/231061
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319095100007
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofMIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.titleThe Circuitous Nature of Operation Ajax
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage262
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage246
oaire.citation.titleMIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES
oaire.citation.volume49

Files