Publication: KONVANSİYONEL BÖLÜMLÜ PROTEZ VE HASSAS TUTUCULU BÖLÜMLÜ PROTEZLERİN HASTA MEMNUNİYETİ AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
Abstract
Amaç: Kroşe tutuculu ve hassas tutuculu protez kullanan hastaların memnuniyetlerinin estetik, fonasyon, fonksiyon demografik özellikleri ile protez memnuniyetleri arasındaki ilişkiyi sorgulamaktır. Materyal ve Metod: Marmara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi A.D Kliniği'nde 2003-2013 yılları arasında Konvansiyonel Bölümlü Protez (KBP) ve Hassas Tutuculu Bölümlü Protez (HBP) yaptırmış hastalardan rastgele seçilmiş 300 adet hasta 150 kişilik 2 gruba ayrılmıştır (n=150). Hastaların hareketli protezleriyle ilgili memnuniyetlerini değerlendirmek amacıyla anket hazırlamıştır. Anket hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi, gelir düzeyi, kullandığı protez sayısı, protez kullanım süreleri ve protez memnuniyeti ile ilgili 19 adet soruyu içermektedir. Hastalara telefon edilerek ankete katılıp katılmayacakları sorulmuş, katılmak isteyen hastalara ilgili 19 soru yöneltilmiştir. Sonuçlar % 95 güven aralığında anlamlılık p<0,05 düzeyinde, veriler t testi, Ki-kare, One-Way Anova analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Eğitim durumu ile kullanılan protez çeşidi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Çiğneme memnuniyeti, protezi rahatlıkla temizleyebilme ve protezi temizlemeye olan ilgi, kendini güvende hissetme, rahat konuşma, rahat takıp çıkarabilme, protezlerini daha estetik bulma ve yemek yerken protezin hareket etmemesi yüzdesi hassas tutuculu protez kullanan hastalarda daha yüksektir. Sonuç: Hassas tutucu protez kullanan hastaların memnuniyeti konvansiyonel protez kullananlardan daha fazladır
Aim: To compare satisfaction of patients who use conventional partial dentures and partial denture with precision attachment in terms of function, esthetic and phonation and to question the relationship between demographic characteristics and denture satisfaction. Material and Method: 300 patients who were treated with conventional partial denture and partial denture with precision attachment were selected randomly from patients who were referred to Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, between 2003-2013 periods. Patients were divided in two groups, each of 150 patients. A questionnaire was prepared to assess patients’ satisfaction of denture. Questionnaire included 19 questions (patients’ age, gender, education level, number of denture used, duration of denture usage). All data were analysed by using t-test, chi-square, Oneway Anova p<0,05. Results: Statistically significant correlation was found between educational level and the type of denture (p<0.05). Patients who were using partial dentures with precision attachement had significantly more satisfaction for chewing. Also success rate were higher for cleaning denture, more self-confidence, better speaking, insertion of denture more comfortable, better esthetic satisfaction, more denture stability while eating. Conclusion: Satisfaction of patients who treated with partial denture with precison attachment was higher than patients who were using conventional partial denture
Aim: To compare satisfaction of patients who use conventional partial dentures and partial denture with precision attachment in terms of function, esthetic and phonation and to question the relationship between demographic characteristics and denture satisfaction. Material and Method: 300 patients who were treated with conventional partial denture and partial denture with precision attachment were selected randomly from patients who were referred to Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, between 2003-2013 periods. Patients were divided in two groups, each of 150 patients. A questionnaire was prepared to assess patients’ satisfaction of denture. Questionnaire included 19 questions (patients’ age, gender, education level, number of denture used, duration of denture usage). All data were analysed by using t-test, chi-square, Oneway Anova p<0,05. Results: Statistically significant correlation was found between educational level and the type of denture (p<0.05). Patients who were using partial dentures with precision attachement had significantly more satisfaction for chewing. Also success rate were higher for cleaning denture, more self-confidence, better speaking, insertion of denture more comfortable, better esthetic satisfaction, more denture stability while eating. Conclusion: Satisfaction of patients who treated with partial denture with precison attachment was higher than patients who were using conventional partial denture