Publication:
Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Stromal Tumors: A Rare Cancer Network Study

dc.contributor.authorsSchick, Ulrike; Bolukbasi, Yasmin; Thariat, Juliette; Abdah-Bortnyak, Roxolyana; Kuten, Abraham; Igdem, Sefik; Caglar, Hale; Ozsaran, Zeynep; Loessl, Kristina; Schleicher, Ursula; Zwahlen, Daniel; Villette, Sylviane; Vees, Hansjoerg
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T18:07:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T17:38:47Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T18:07:38Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To provide further understanding regarding outcome and prognostic factors of endometrial stromal tumors (EST). Methods and Materials: A retrospective analysis was performed on the records of 59 women diagnosed with EST and treated with curative intent between 1983 and 2007 in the framework of the Rare Cancer Network. Results: Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) were found in 44% and undifferentiated ESS (UES) in 49% of the cases. In 7% the grading was unclear. Of the total number of patients, 33 had Stage I, 4 Stage II, 20 Stage III, and 1 presented with Stage IVB disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 12 patients, all with UES. External-beam radiotherapy (RT) was administered postoperatively to 48 women. The median follow-up was 41.4 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 96.2% and 64.8% for ESS and UES, respectively, with a corresponding 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 49.4% and 43.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, adjuvant RT was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.007) and DFS (p = 0.013). Locoregional control, DFS, and OS were significantly associated with age (<= 60 vs. >60 years), grade (ESS vs. UES), and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (I-II vs. III-IV). Positive lymph node staging had an impact on OS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The prognosis of ESS differed from that of UES. Endometrial stromal sarcomas had an excellent 5-year OS, whereas the OS in UES was rather low. However, half of ESS patients had a relapse. For this reason, adjuvant treatment such as RT should be considered even in low-grade tumors. Multicenter randomized studies are still warranted to establish clear guidelines. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.005
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016
dc.identifier.pubmed22300565
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/231043
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000301891300008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEndometrial stromal sarcoma
dc.subjectUndifferentiated sarcoma
dc.subjectRadiotherapy
dc.subjectGYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP
dc.subjectLYMPH-NODE METASTASES
dc.subjectRADIATION-THERAPY
dc.subjectUTERINE SARCOMAS
dc.subjectSTAGE-II
dc.subjectGRADE
dc.subjectRADIOTHERAPY
dc.subjectSURVIVAL
dc.subjectLYMPHADENECTOMY
dc.subjectMALIGNANCY
dc.titleOutcome and Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Stromal Tumors: A Rare Cancer Network Study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPageE763
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPageE757
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
oaire.citation.volume82

Files