Publication:
Comparison of aerobic and combined aerobic and whole-body vibration training effects on physical fitness in non-alcoholic fatty liver patients

dc.contributor.authorsSaldiran, T. Cevik; Mutluay, F. Karantay; Yagci, I; Yilmaz, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:57:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T06:01:14Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercises with whole-body vibration which was added to aerobic training on the physical fitness of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Thirty-two patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver (age 44.39 +/- 8.74 years) were randomly divided into an aerobic training + vibration group and an aerobic training + sham vibration group. The aerobic training was continued at 60-80% heart rate workload, 40 min per day during 3 days per week, for 8 weeks. Vibration were performed with dynamic and static exercises at 30 Hz, with a 2 mm amplitude, for 15 min. The energy expenditure responses were carried out by an exercise tolerance test system. Lower limb isometric muscle strength assessment was made with a calibrated handheld dynamometer from bilaterally knee extensors. The sit to stand test, and the time up and go test were used for physical performance evaluation. At eight weeks, both groups showed a significant reduction in the sit to stand (-1.62 +/- 1.00 vs -0.37 +/- 1.52), the time up and go test (-1.43 +/- 0.99 vs -1.39 +/- 1.06), the right lower extremity muscle strength (1.01 +/- 1.61 vs 1.22 +/- 2.82), and the energy expenditure scores (MET; 1.88 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19; 2.57, d=0.55, minimal clinically important difference (McID) = 0.69 vs 2.01 ml/kg/min, 95% CI 0.76; 3.24, d=0.26, McID = 1.54, respectively), however no significant differences emerged between groups (P >= 0.05). The addition of vibration exercises to an aerobic program did not provide additional benefits to physical fitness in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver.
dc.identifier.doi10.3920/CEP200075
dc.identifier.eissn1755-2559
dc.identifier.issn1755-2540
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/237052
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000662030000010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
dc.relation.ispartofCOMPARATIVE EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectfatty liver
dc.subjectaerobic exercise
dc.subjectacceleration
dc.subjectphysical fitness
dc.subjectSKELETAL-MUSCLE
dc.subjectPOSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
dc.subjectINSULIN SENSITIVITY
dc.subjectOLDER PERSONS
dc.subjectDISEASE
dc.subjectEXERCISE
dc.subjectSTIFFNESS
dc.subjectSTRENGTH
dc.subjectBENEFITS
dc.subjectBALANCE
dc.titleComparison of aerobic and combined aerobic and whole-body vibration training effects on physical fitness in non-alcoholic fatty liver patients
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage401
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage393
oaire.citation.titleCOMPARATIVE EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume17

Files