Publication: Once-weekly insulin icodec with dosing guide app versus once-daily basal insulin analogues in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 5) : A randomized trial
| dc.contributor.author | YAVUZ, DİLEK | |
| dc.contributor.authors | Bajaj H. S., Aberle J., Davies M., Donatsky A. M., Frederiksen M., Yavuz D., Gowda A., Lingvay I., Bode B. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-03T10:29:05Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-11T10:46:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-03T10:29:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-09-26 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Inadequate dose titration and poor adherence to basal insulin can lead to suboptimal glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue that is in development and is aimed at reducing treatment burden. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of icodec titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily basal insulin analogues (OD analogues) dosed per standard practice. Design: 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trial with real-world elements. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04760626) Setting: 176 sites in 7 countries. Participants: 1085 insulin-naive adults with T2D. Intervention: Icodec with app or OD analogue (insulin degludec, insulin glargine U100, or insulin glargine U300). Measurements: The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 52. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (Treatment Related Impact Measure for Diabetes [TRIM-D] compliance domain score and change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] total treatment satisfaction score). Results: The estimated mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 52 was greater with icodec with app than with OD analogues, with noninferiority (P < 0.001) and superiority (P = 0.009) confirmed in prespecified hierarchical testing (estimated treatment difference [ETD], −0.38 percentage points [95% CI, −0.66 to −0.09 percentage points]). At week 52, patient-reported outcomes were more favorable with icodec with app than with OD analogues (ETDs, 3.04 [CI, 1.28 to 4.81] for TRIM-D and 0.78 [CI, 0.10 to 1.47] for DTSQ). Rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were low and similar with both treatments. Limitation: Inability to differentiate the effects of icodec and the dosing guide app. Conclusion: Compared with OD analogues, icodec with app showed superior HbA1c reduction and improved treatment satisfaction and compliance with similarly low hypoglycemia rates. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bajaj H. S., Aberle J., Davies M., Donatsky A. M., Frederiksen M., Yavuz D., Gowda A., Lingvay I., Bode B., "Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5) : A Randomized Trial.", Annals of internal medicine, 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7326/m23-1288 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-4819 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/294223 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of internal medicine | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Adverse events | |
| dc.subject | Clinical trials | |
| dc.subject | Confidence intervals | |
| dc.subject | HbA1c | |
| dc.subject | Hypoglycemia | |
| dc.subject | Hypoglycemics | |
| dc.subject | Insulin | |
| dc.subject | Randomized trials | |
| dc.subject | Safety | |
| dc.subject | Treatment guidelines | |
| dc.title | Once-weekly insulin icodec with dosing guide app versus once-daily basal insulin analogues in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 5) : A randomized trial | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
