Publication:
Comparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy

dc.contributor.authorBİNNETOĞLU, ADEM
dc.contributor.authorOYSU, ÇAĞATAY
dc.contributor.authorsDemir, Berat; Binnetoglu, Adem; Gurol, Ece; Oysu, Cagatay
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:56:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T11:37:04Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:56:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose. To compare the quality of life of patients with early glottic carcinoma who have been treated using three treatment modalities: endoscopic cordectomy using radiofrequency microdissection electrodes (ECRM), transoral laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy (RT). ECRM, transoral laser cordectomy, and RT can all be used as alternatives to invasive open surgery to treat the early stages of glottic cancer such as stage T1. Patients treated using these different modalities could have different outcomes with respect to voice quality of life. Materials and Methods. The voice quality of life was measured in patients who underwent ECRM, transoral diode laser excision, or RT for early laryngeal cancer. Post-treatment quality of voice was assessed using the Turkish version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire in all patients after 1 year of cancer-free survival. A comparison was then made between the outcomes of the three groups. Results. The total score of the ECRM group, when compared independently to that of the laser and the RT groups, was found to be statistically higher in both cases. However, no statistically significant differences were found between laser and RT groups in terms of any parameters. There was a statistically significant difference between the RT group and the other groups in terms of percentage jitter, percentage shimmer, and fundamental frequency (F0) (P < 0.05). While the RT group had the longest maximum phonation time (P < 0.001), no significant differences were found between the maximum phonation time of the ECRM and the laser groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Overall, the worst outcome with respect to voice quality of life is seen with ECRM. Since there were no significant differences in quality of life between the other two treatment modalities, it is recommended to leave the choice between RT and laser surgery up to the patient.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.003
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4588
dc.identifier.issn0892-1997
dc.identifier.pubmed31784258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/236894
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000655658000024
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF VOICE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLaryngeal cancer
dc.subjectLaser
dc.subjectRadiofrequency ablation
dc.subjectRadiotherapy
dc.subjectVoice quality
dc.subjectDIODE-LASER
dc.subjectSURGERY
dc.subjectCANCER
dc.subjectMICROSURGERY
dc.titleComparison of Voice Quality of Life in Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma Treated with Endoscopic Cordectomy Using Radiofrequency Microdissection Electrodes, Laser Cordectomy, and Radiotherapy
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage482
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage477
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF VOICE
oaire.citation.volume35

Files