Publication:
Is second-line systemic chemotherapy beneficial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? A multicenter data evaluation by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology

dc.contributor.authorDANE, FAYSAL
dc.contributor.authorsOdabas, Hatice; Ulas, Arife; Aydin, Kubra; Inanc, Mevlude; Aksoy, Asude; Yazilitas, Dogan; Turkeli, Mehmet; Yuksel, Sinemis; Inal, Ali; Ekinci, Ahmet S.; Sevinc, Alper; Demirci, Nebi S.; Uysal, Mukremin; Alkis, Necati; Dane, Faysal; Aliustaoglu, Mehmet; Gumus, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T20:27:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:28:58Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T20:27:00Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractPatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) generally require second-line treatment although their prognosis is poor. In this multicenter study, we aimed to detect the characteristics related to patients and disease that can predict the response to second-line treatments in advanced NSCLC. Data of 904 patients who have progressed after receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in 11 centers with the diagnosis of stage IIIB and IV NSCLC and who were evaluated for second-line treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The role of different factors in determining the benefit of second-line treatment was analyzed. Median age of patients was 57 years (range 19-86). Docetaxel was the most commonly used (20.9 %, n = 189) single agent, while gemcitabine-platinum was the most commonly used (6.7 %, n = 61) combination chemotherapy regimen in second-line setting. According to survival analysis, median progression-free survival after first-line treatment (PFS2) was 3.5 months (standard error (SE) 0.2; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 3.2-3.9), median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 months (SE 0.3; 95 % CI, 6.0-7.3). In multivariate analysis, independent factors affecting PFS2 were found to be hemoglobin (Hb) level over 12 g/dl and treatment-free interval (TFI) longer than 3 months (p = 0.006 and 0.003, respectively). Similarly, in OS analysis, Hb level over 12 g/dl and time elapsed after the first-line treatment that is longer than 3 months were found to be independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0001 and 0.045, respectively). In light of these findings, determining and using the parameters for which the treatment will be beneficial prior to second-line treatment can increase success rate.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13277-015-3728-0
dc.identifier.eissn1423-0380
dc.identifier.issn1010-4283
dc.identifier.pubmed26150339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/233602
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000367329300059
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofTUMOR BIOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectHemoglobin level
dc.subjectNon-small cell lung cancer
dc.subjectSecond-line treatment
dc.subjectPrognostic factors
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.subjectPHASE-III TRIAL
dc.subjectPLATINUM-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY
dc.subjectSUPPORTIVE CARE
dc.subjectDOCETAXEL
dc.subjectMETASTASIS
dc.subjectERLOTINIB
dc.subjectSURVIVAL
dc.titleIs second-line systemic chemotherapy beneficial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? A multicenter data evaluation by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage9648
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage9641
oaire.citation.titleTUMOR BIOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume36

Files