Publication:
China's role in the regional and international management of Korean conflict: an arbiter or catalyst?

dc.contributor.authorBELDER, FERİT
dc.contributor.authorMEHMETCİK, HAKAN
dc.contributor.authorsMehmetcik, Hakan; Belder, Ferit
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:24:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T20:50:24Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:24:49Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThere are diverging assessments of China's role in resolving the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula. China's role has been characterised variously as a bystander, arbiter, catalyst and mediator over the years. This paper aims to clarify where China stands on North Korea and assesses the different phases of the Chinese approach to conflict resolution during the North Korean nuclear crisis. The main argument is that China wishes to maintain the regional status quo while appearing to adjust its position in line with the international community. China's current duplicity stems from its different priorities and concerns to the remainder of the world, and can best be explained using a role theory analysis.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01436597.2018.1522955
dc.identifier.eissn1360-2241
dc.identifier.issn0143-6597
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/234838
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000459715200004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofTHIRD WORLD QUARTERLY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectNorth Korea
dc.subjectrole theory
dc.subjectNorth Korean nuclear crisis
dc.subjectconflict management
dc.subjectPOLICY
dc.titleChina's role in the regional and international management of Korean conflict: an arbiter or catalyst?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage2271
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage2255
oaire.citation.titleTHIRD WORLD QUARTERLY
oaire.citation.volume39

Files