Publication:
Evaluation of salivary gland ultrasonography in primary Sjogren's syndrome: does it reflect clinical activity and outcome of the disease?

dc.contributor.authorsInanc, N.; Ahinkaya, Y.; Mumcu, G.; Ozdemir, F. Ture; Paksoy, A.; Erturk, Z.; Direskeneli, H.; Bruyn, G. A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:30:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T16:28:25Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjective. To evaluate associations between salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) and clinical characteristics, disease activity and outcome in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS). Methods. The parotid and submandibular salivary glands were examined by ultrasonography using two different scoring systems proposed by Hocevar et al. and Milic et al. on 85 pSS patients. Patients with inhomogeneity/hypoechoic areas with scores >= 2 in parotid and submandibular glands were classified as severe parotid or severe submandibular involvements, respectively. Disease activity and patient-reported severity were evaluated using the European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren's Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) and the European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren's Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI). Salivary gland functional capacity was investigated by unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (U-WSFR). Results. Of the activity scores, ESSPRI dryness component was higher in pSS patients who had scores above the cut-off values for Hocevar (6.1 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.9 +/- 2.6, p=0.02 6). The patients with any type of systemic involvement more frequently showed higher SGUS scores, according to both Hocevar (72.4 vs. 44.6%, p=0.01 3) and Milic (75.9 vs. 51.8%, p=0.026). These patients also showed a higher percentage of severe parotid/submandibular changes on US imaging (65.5 vs. 33.9%, p=0.005 and 75.9 vs. 51.8%, p=0.02 6 respectively). Higher SGUS scores according to cut-off values of both scoring systems and severe parotid/submandibular involvements were associated with both anti-Ro or double anti-Ro/La autoantibodies and inversely associated with U-WSFR. Conclusion. SGUS may be a useful imaging modality for the selection of patients with more severe disease status or who may require a tight follow-up schedule.
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000488952900021
dc.identifier.eissn1593-098X
dc.identifier.issn0392-856X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/235448
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000488952900021
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCLINICAL & EXPER RHEUMATOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectsalivary gland ultrasonography
dc.subjectprimary Sjogren's syndrome
dc.subjectdisease activity
dc.subjectCLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
dc.subjectDIAGNOSTIC-VALUE
dc.subjectSIALOGRAPHY
dc.subjectULTRASOUND
dc.subjectSCORE
dc.subjectRITUXIMAB
dc.subjectCONSENSUS
dc.subjectTOOL
dc.titleEvaluation of salivary gland ultrasonography in primary Sjogren's syndrome: does it reflect clinical activity and outcome of the disease?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPageS145
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPageS140
oaire.citation.titleCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume37

Files