Publication:
Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study

dc.contributor.authorKARTAL, NEVİN
dc.contributor.authorCİMİLLİ, ZÜHRE HALE
dc.contributor.authorsAydemir, Seda; Cimilli, Hale; Yoruç, Afife Binnaz Hazar; Kartal, Nevin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T05:49:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:37:27Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T05:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal walls of root‑end cavities for the presence of cracks after cavity preparation using US retrotips and Er: YAG laser. Materials and Methods: Fifty single‑rooted teeth were prepared by Protaper NiTi rotary system and obturated by lateral condensation. Three milimeters of root‑end was resected. Twenty teeth were prepared with US retrotip (Group 1), 20 teeth with Er: YAG laser (Group 2), and 10 teeth without retropreparation (control group). The root‑end surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Then the cracks of the resected root surfaces were evaluated on microphotographs. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between US Group and Laser Group for complete, incomplete, intradentinal, and total number of cracks (P = 0.47, P = 0.80, P = 0.69, P = 0.869, respectively). Conclusion: Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of retropreparation technique on the development of apical cracks (P > 0.05).
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.110168
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456, 1305-7464
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pages186-190
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/219002
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttp://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/1305-7456.110168
dc.titleEvaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
856.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format