Publication:
Comparison of the Efficacy of Single or Double Intravesical Epirubicin Instillation in the Early Postoperative Period to Prevent Recurrences in Non-Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study

dc.contributor.authorTANIDIR, YILÖREN
dc.contributor.authorsTurkeri, Levent; Tanidir, Yiloren; Cal, Cag; Ozen, Haluk; Sahin, Hayrettin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:49:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T14:40:52Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:49:11Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the efficacy of single or double epirubicin instillation during the early postoperative period (EPP) in intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer. Methods: Patients with primary and solitary or multiple (3 or less) Ta (grade 2-3) or T1 (grade 1-2) tumors were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of 100 mg epirubicin instillation within 6 h or a second 100 mg epirubicin instillation during the 12th-18th hours after a complete TUR-BT. At the end of the 60-month follow-up period, the available data were statistically analyzed. The end-points of the study were determined as disease-free survival, progression and recurrence rates, time to recurrence, and time to progression. Results: A total of 299 patients from 24 institutions were randomized between January 2002 and June 2004. There were 143 patients from 18 institutions who met the eligibility criteria. The follow-up and disease-free survival periods were 16.9 months and 16 months, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the demographic properties and the end-points between the groups. Conclusions: A single dose of intravesical 100 mg epirubicin chemotherapy during the early postoperative period for primary intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer achieved 16 months of mean disease-free survival. A second intravesical epirubicin instillation did not provide any significant benefit. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000300571
dc.identifier.eissn1423-0399
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138
dc.identifier.pubmed20332605
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230059
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000283550200003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKARGER
dc.relation.ispartofUROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBladder cancer, non-muscle-invasive
dc.subjectIntravesical chemotherapy
dc.subjectEpirubicin
dc.subjectRecurrence-free survival
dc.subjectTRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA
dc.subjectSTAGE TA
dc.subjectTRANSURETHRAL RESECTION
dc.subjectCANCER
dc.subjectCHEMOTHERAPY
dc.subjectPROPHYLAXIS
dc.subjectRISK
dc.titleComparison of the Efficacy of Single or Double Intravesical Epirubicin Instillation in the Early Postoperative Period to Prevent Recurrences in Non-Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage265
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage261
oaire.citation.titleUROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
oaire.citation.volume85

Files