Publication:
Five-year Treatment Outcomes with Four Types of Implants in the Posterior Maxilla and Mandible in Partially Edentulous Patients: A Retrospective Study

dc.contributor.authorsOzkan, Yasar; Akoglu, Burcin; Kulak-Ozkan, Yasemin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:49:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T17:46:31Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:49:46Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes, after 5 years of functional loading, of four different types of implants supporting prostheses in the posterior maxilla and mandible. Materials and Methods: Patients missing posterior teeth were treated with implants between 1998 and 2004. The implants were evaluated by clinical and radiographic parameters and Plaque Index, Sulcus Bleeding Index (131), peri-implant probing depths (PD), and marginal bone loss (MBL) were recorded. Repeated-measures analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: In all, 244 implants were placed in 83 patients: 86 Straumann implants, 35 Swiss Plus implants, 90 Cam log implants, and 33 Frialit implants. Patients received 93 single crowns and 71 fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Nine FPDs were cemented to both implants and natural teeth, and 62 FPDs were supported by implants only. At the 5-year recall, plaque accumulation was significantly higher than at baseline for all groups (P = .01). Mean PD was 1.8 mm in the maxilla and 1.6 mm in the mandible. The mean PD values were 1.77 +/- 0.52 mm for Straumann, 1.87 +/- 0.64 mm for Swiss Plus, 2.33 +/- 0.58 mm for Cam log, and 2.29 +/- 0.46 mm for Frialit. MBL was 0.19 +/- 0.07 mm for Straumann, 0.27 +/- 0.06 mm for Cam log, 0.26 +/- 0.07 mm for Swiss Plus, and 0.24 +/- 0.07 mm for Frialit. The mean MBL of Straumann implants was significantly lower than that seen in the other groups (P = .001). Conclusion: The four types of implants resulted in similar clinical success after 5 years. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2011;26:639-647
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000291893100021
dc.identifier.eissn1942-4434
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.pubmed21691612
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230115
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000291893100021
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.subjectpartial edentulism
dc.subjectposterior mandible
dc.subjectposterior maxilla
dc.subjecttitanium implants
dc.subjectSUBMERGED TITANIUM IMPLANTS
dc.subjectFIXED PARTIAL DENTURES
dc.subjectENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS
dc.subjectSURVIVAL
dc.subjectREGION
dc.titleFive-year Treatment Outcomes with Four Types of Implants in the Posterior Maxilla and Mandible in Partially Edentulous Patients: A Retrospective Study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage647
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage639
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
oaire.citation.volume26

Files