Publication:
pVEC hydrophobic N-terminus is critical for antibacterial activity

dc.contributor.authorSARIYAR AKBULUT, BERNA
dc.contributor.authorsAlaybeyoglu, Begum; Akbulut, Berna Sariyar; Ozkirimli, Elif
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:26:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T07:59:35Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:26:11Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractCell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are commonly defined by their shared ability to be internalized into eukaryotic cells, without inducing permanent membrane damage, and to improve cargo delivery. Many CPPs also possess antimicrobial action strong enough to selectively lyse microbes in infected mammalian cultures. pVEC, a CPP derived from cadherin, is able to translocate into mammalian cells, and it is also antimicrobial. Structure-activity relationship and sequence alignment studies have suggested that the hydrophobic N-terminus (LLIIL) of pVEC is essential for this peptide's uptake into eukaryotic cells. In this study, our aim was to examine the contribution of these residues to the antimicrobial action and the translocation mechanism of pVEC. We performed antimicrobial activity and microscopy experiments with pVEC and with del5 pVEC (N-terminal truncated variant of pVEC) and showed that pVEC loses its antimicrobial effect upon deletion of the LLIIL residues, even though both peptides induce membrane permeability. We also calculated the free energy of the transport process using steered molecular dynamic simulations and replica exchange umbrella sampling simulations to compare the difference in uptake mechanism of the 2 peptides in atomistic detail. Despite the difference in experimentally observed antimicrobial activity, the simulations on the 2 peptides showed similar characteristics and the energetic cost of translocation of pVEC was higher than that of del5 pVEC, suggesting that pVEC uptake mechanism cannot be explained by simple passive transport. Our results suggest that LLIIL residues are key contributors to pVEC antibacterial activity because of irreversible membrane disruption.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/psc.3083
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1387
dc.identifier.issn1075-2617
dc.identifier.pubmed29737576
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/235027
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000434276400003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectantibacterial activity
dc.subjectcell-penetrating peptide
dc.subjectfree energy calculations
dc.subjectpVEC
dc.subjectreplica exchange umbrella sampling
dc.subjectsteered molecular dynamics
dc.subjectuptake mechanism
dc.subjectCELL-PENETRATING PEPTIDES
dc.subjectMOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS
dc.subjectFREE-ENERGY CALCULATIONS
dc.subjectHIV-1 TAT PEPTIDE
dc.subjectINTERNALIZATION MECHANISMS
dc.subjectANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES
dc.subjectPLASMA-MEMBRANE
dc.subjectLIPID-BILAYERS
dc.subjectFORCE-FIELD
dc.subjectARGININE
dc.titlepVEC hydrophobic N-terminus is critical for antibacterial activity
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
oaire.citation.volume24

Files