Publication:
Comparative Performance Analysis of 4 Different Anti-Citrullinated Protein Assays in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

dc.contributor.authorsMutlu, Nilgun; Bicakcigil, Muge; Tasan, Demet A.; Kaya, Ayhan; Yavuz, Sule; Ozden, A. Inci
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:46:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:28:21Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:46:55Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractObjective. To evaluate the diagnostic performances of 2 recently developed assays, third-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide(anti-CCP3) and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV), in comparison to conventional second-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2) assay; and to assess a novel fully automated, random-access AxSYM anti-CCP assay for early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. A cohort of 176 patients was enrolled in our study; 93 were diagnosed as having RA. The non-RA group consisted of 83 patients including 38 with Systemic lupus erythematosus, 17 with primary Sjogren's syndrome, 11 with osteoarthritis, and 17 healthy controls. All were tested for presence of anti-CCP2, anti-CCP3, AxSYM anti-CCP, anti-MCV, and rheumatoid factor (RF)-IgM according to the manufacturers' instructions. Results. Diagnostic performance of the assays revealed the highest area under the Curve for the novel AxSYM anti-CCP [89.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 84.3-93.8], followed by anti-CCP3 (86.7; 95% CI 81.6-91.9), anti-CCP2 (82; 95% CI 75.8-88.3), and anti-MCV (71.9 95% CI 64.4-79.5). The sensitivities and specificities were 60.2% and 98.8% for anti-CCP2, 61.3% and 97.6% for anti-CCP3, 80.6% and 84.3% for AxSYM anti-CCP 49.8% and 91.6% for anti-MCV, and 67.8% and 91.6% for RF-IgM, respectively. Conclusion. At cutoff of 5 U/ml, AxSYM anti-CCP emerged as a highly sensitive first-line early diagnostic tool for RA, with the greatest discrimination power, above 16 U/ml, in case of positive result. Using a single easily performed automated assay at 2 determined decision limits we were able to diagnose 81% of cases of RA and missing only 1.2%. (First Release Feb 15 2009; J Rheumatol 2009;36:491-500; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080656)
dc.identifier.doi10.3899/jrheum.080656
dc.identifier.eissn1499-2752
dc.identifier.issn0315-162X
dc.identifier.pubmed19228660
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/229608
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000263940000006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJ RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAUTOMATION
dc.subjectCYCLIC CITRULLINATED PEPTIDE AUTOANTIBODIES
dc.subjectDIFFERENTIATION
dc.subjectDIAGNOSIS
dc.subjectEARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
dc.subjectMUTATED CITRULLINATED VIMENTIN
dc.subjectCLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
dc.subjectREVISED CRITERIA
dc.subjectPEPTIDE ANTIBODIES
dc.subjectVIMENTIN
dc.subject2ND-GENERATION
dc.subjectPREDICTION
dc.subjectACCURACY
dc.titleComparative Performance Analysis of 4 Different Anti-Citrullinated Protein Assays in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage500
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage491
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume36

Files