Publication:
A classical vascular dilemma: Limb salvage or amputation?

dc.contributor.authorsTekeli A., Akgün S., Ak K., Isbir S., Civelek A., Baltacioǧlu F.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T14:51:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T08:00:15Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T14:51:07Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.description.abstractPopliteal artery injuries are the most challenging of all extremity vascular injuries. The popliteal vein, infrapopliteal arteries and the tibial nerve are the most commonly injured structures in penetrating popliteal trauma patients. Despite the experience obtained from the major wars in this century, ongoing advances in vascular surgery and near 100% limb salvage reports from current literature in popliteal artery penetrating trauma, there is still an ongoing debate about the management of such injuries. These injuries require a multidisciplinary approach for appropriate management. One of the major conflicts is the decision between amputation or salvaging the limb. According to the current data and our clinical experience, evaluation and decision making in this group of injuries is mostly patient dependent. In this case report, we present a young man with a left popliteal region gunshot injury. Immediately after the injury a limb salvage procedure was performed by our team. Now the patient has a conserved limb but functionally amputated extremity after 4 months of hospital stay.
dc.identifier.issn10191941
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/255612
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMarmara Medical Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectGunshot wounds
dc.subjectPenetrating vascular injury
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.titleA classical vascular dilemma: Limb salvage or amputation?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage112
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage110
oaire.citation.titleMarmara Medical Journal
oaire.citation.volume14

Files