Publication: İslam hukukunda müteselsil borçluluk
Abstract
Bu çalışma İslam hukukunda müteselsil borçluluk kavramını ele almakta ve modern hukukla karşılaştırmalı olarak yeniden yorumlamaktadır. Aynı zamanda kavram hakkında analizlerde bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmaya başlık olarak ' İslam Hukukunda Müteselsil Borçluluk' adı konulmuştur. Bu konu klasik İslam hukuku kaynaklarında müstakil olarak ele alınmamış fakat ilgili diğer bölümler altında incelenmiştir. Bu nedenle İslam hukuku sahasında yapılan çalışmalar dışında modern hukuk çalışmaları da bu çalışmaya kaynaklık etmiştir. Bu çalışma iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde borçlu ve alacaklıların birden fazla olduğu durumlar ele alınmıştır. Yine bu bölümde İslam hukukunda müteselsil borçluluk kavramının genel hatları çizilmiştir. Bu bölüm dört kısımdan oluşmaktadır. Her kısımda borçlunun birden fazla olduğu durumlarda müteselsilliğin var olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. İkinci bölüm sadece müteselsil borçluluk hakkındadır. Bu bölümde modern hukuktaki müteselsil borçluluk kavramı özetlendikten sonra İslam hukukundaki müteselsil borçluluk kavramının modern hukukla karşılaştırması yapılmış ve bu kavramının klasik İslam hukuku kaynakları ile modern çalışmalarda nasıl adlandırıldığı incelenmiştir. Bu bölümde müteselsil borçluluk kavramının tedamün ve kefalet kavramıyla ilişkisi de ele alınmıştır. Bu bölümde aynı zamanda konu hakkındaki mezheb ve müctehitlerin farklı görüşleri modern hukuk ve İslam hukuku açısından ele alınmıştır. Sonuç bölümünde müteselsil borçluluğun ne olduğu özetlenmiş ve müteselsil borçluluk kavramının modern hukuktaki kavramla aynı şey olup olmadığı incelenmiştir.
This dissertation examines the solidarity obligation concept in İslamic law and reinterprited it comparing with modern law. It is also offers a critical analysis of the concept too. As a result it is entitled as solidarity obligation in İslamic law. In the classical İslamic resources the subject is not mentioned as an independent part but under the heading of other related parts. For this, it is being more difficult to define the subject. The works on the modern law guided us to define the manner of dissertation beside the contemporary works on İslamic law. The dissertation contains two chapters. In the chapter I. it is described the cases which the figure of debtors and obligees more than one. This chapter draws the general outlines of the solidarity obligation concept in İslamic law. This chapter also contains four parts. In every part it is investigated if the solidarity is being or not in these cases which the debtors and obligees more than one. The second chapter is about solidarity obligation concept only. In this section after summarizing the solidarity obligation concept in modern law it is examined the solidarity concept in İslamic law dealing whith the differencies between them and it is pointed out how the concept called in the classical resources and in the contemporary works. In this chapter it is investigated how the solidarity obligation concept used in the classical resources and in contemporary works. In this chapter it is examined if the solidarity obligation term is the same thing with the term of 'tedamün' and to stand bail is related with solidarity. This chapter also contains the different thought of mezahib and müctehid's and offers an analysis critisizing the subject not only with the perspective of İslamic but modern law. In the conclusion it is summarized what the solidarity obligation is and it is analyised is solidarity obligation concept is being in İslamic and is it the same thing which in modern law.
This dissertation examines the solidarity obligation concept in İslamic law and reinterprited it comparing with modern law. It is also offers a critical analysis of the concept too. As a result it is entitled as solidarity obligation in İslamic law. In the classical İslamic resources the subject is not mentioned as an independent part but under the heading of other related parts. For this, it is being more difficult to define the subject. The works on the modern law guided us to define the manner of dissertation beside the contemporary works on İslamic law. The dissertation contains two chapters. In the chapter I. it is described the cases which the figure of debtors and obligees more than one. This chapter draws the general outlines of the solidarity obligation concept in İslamic law. This chapter also contains four parts. In every part it is investigated if the solidarity is being or not in these cases which the debtors and obligees more than one. The second chapter is about solidarity obligation concept only. In this section after summarizing the solidarity obligation concept in modern law it is examined the solidarity concept in İslamic law dealing whith the differencies between them and it is pointed out how the concept called in the classical resources and in the contemporary works. In this chapter it is investigated how the solidarity obligation concept used in the classical resources and in contemporary works. In this chapter it is examined if the solidarity obligation term is the same thing with the term of 'tedamün' and to stand bail is related with solidarity. This chapter also contains the different thought of mezahib and müctehid's and offers an analysis critisizing the subject not only with the perspective of İslamic but modern law. In the conclusion it is summarized what the solidarity obligation is and it is analyised is solidarity obligation concept is being in İslamic and is it the same thing which in modern law.