Publication: Kültürün İktidarı: Dindar Muhafazakârlık ve Kültürel Egemenlik
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Bu makalede, Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi’nin (AKP) çeşitli kademedeki temsilcileri
tarafından sürekli gündemde tutulan “kültürel iktidar” meselesi incelenmektedir. Bu mesele,
AKP’nin siyasal alandaki iktidarını kültürel alana taşıma arzusunu ifade etmektedir. Kültürel
iktidar arzusu, açıklayıcı evrenini, referans çerçevesi “dindar muhafazakâr” olan AKP’nin
Türkiye’nin laik modernleşme tarafından belirlenmiş yakın tarihinde kendi siyasi
pozisyonunu sağlamlaştırma sürecinde bulmaktadır. Makalede, AKP’nin kapitalist dünya
düzenine eklemlenen muhafazakârlığının özellikle kentli dindarlarda belirgin bir kültürel
habitus dönüşümüne yol açtığı, belli ölçülerde gündelik yaşamı muhafazakârlaştırdığı, fakat
kültürel alanın edebiyat, sinema, tiyatro, müzik gibi sanatsal üretime vurgu yapan kısmında
benzer sonuçlara ulaşamadığı ve bu durumun kültürel iktidar tartışmasını muhalefet için de
önemli hale getirdiği üzerinde durulmuştur. Bunlardan hareketle, gerçekte çatışan tutumların
ve değerlerin alanı olan kültürün, dindar muhafazakârlık ile laik modernlik arasında bir
diyalog alanı olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.
Anahtar kelimeler: Kültürel iktidar, Dindar muhafazakârlık, Laik modernlik, Kültürel
çatışma, Kültürel muhalefet
In this article, the issue of "cultural power", which is constantly kept on the agenda by representatives of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) at various levels, is examined. This issue expresses the AKP's desire to carry its power in the political field to the cultural field. The desire for cultural power finds its explanatory universe in the process by which the AKP, whose frame of reference is the “religious conservative”, consolidates its political position in Turkey's recent history determined by secular modernization. In the article, it is stated that the conservatism of the AKP, integrated into the capitalist world order, has led to a significant cultural habitus transformation, especially among the urban religious people, and has made daily life conservative to a certain extent, but it has not been able to achieve similar results in the part of the cultural field that emphasizes artistic production such as literature, cinema, theater and music, and that this situation It was emphasized that it made the power debate important for the opposition as well. Based on these, it is concluded that culture, which is actually the field of conflicting attitudes and values, can be an area of dialogue between religious conservatism and secular modernity. Keywords: Cultural ower, Religious conservatism, Secular modernity, Cultural conflict, Cultural opposition
In this article, the issue of "cultural power", which is constantly kept on the agenda by representatives of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) at various levels, is examined. This issue expresses the AKP's desire to carry its power in the political field to the cultural field. The desire for cultural power finds its explanatory universe in the process by which the AKP, whose frame of reference is the “religious conservative”, consolidates its political position in Turkey's recent history determined by secular modernization. In the article, it is stated that the conservatism of the AKP, integrated into the capitalist world order, has led to a significant cultural habitus transformation, especially among the urban religious people, and has made daily life conservative to a certain extent, but it has not been able to achieve similar results in the part of the cultural field that emphasizes artistic production such as literature, cinema, theater and music, and that this situation It was emphasized that it made the power debate important for the opposition as well. Based on these, it is concluded that culture, which is actually the field of conflicting attitudes and values, can be an area of dialogue between religious conservatism and secular modernity. Keywords: Cultural ower, Religious conservatism, Secular modernity, Cultural conflict, Cultural opposition
Description
Citation
AYMAZ G., "Kültürün İktidarı: Dindar Muhafazakârlık ve Kültürel Egemenlik", İnsan ve İnsan, sa.38, ss.11-28, 2024
