Publication: Evaluation of multistep derivatization methods for identification and quantification of oxygenated species in organic aerosol
| dc.contributor.author | FLORES RANGEL, ROSA MARIA | |
| dc.contributor.authors | Flores R.M., Doskey P.V. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-15T02:10:55Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-11T16:25:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-15T02:10:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Two, 3-step methods for derivatizing mono- and multi-functional species with carbonyl (CO), carboxylic acid (-COOH), and alcohol (-OH) moieties were compared and optimized. In Method 1, the CO, -COOH, and -OH moieties were converted (1) to methyloximes (R-CN-OCH3) with O-methylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (MHA), (2) to methyl esters (OC-R-OCH3) with (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane in methanol (TMSD/MeOH), and (3) to trimethylsilyl ethers [R-OSi(CH3)3] with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS), respectively. Steps 1 and 3 of both methods were identical; however, in Step 2 of Method 2, -COOH moieties were derivatized with 10% (v/v) boron trifluoride (BF3) in MeOH or n-butanol (n-BuOH). The BF3/MeOH and BF3/n-BuOH were ineffective at converting species with more than 2-OH moieties. Average standard deviations for derivatization of 36 model compounds by the 3-step methods using TMSD/MeOH and BF3/(MeOH) were 7.4 and 14.8%, respectively. Average derivatization efficiencies for Methods 1 and 2 were 88.0 and 114%, respectively. Despite the lower average derivatization efficiency of Method 1, distinct advantages included a greater certainty of derivatization yield for the entire suite of mono- and multi-functional species and fewer processing steps for sequential derivatization. Detection limits for Method 1 using GC×GC-ToF-MS were 0.3-54pgm-3. Approximately 100 oxygenated organic species were identified and quantified in aerosol filtered from 39m3 of air in an urban location. Levels of species were 0.013-17ngm-3 and were nearly all above the Method 1 limit of detection. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.041 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 219673 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 26427323 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/247604 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Chromatography A | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | GC×GC-ToF-MS | |
| dc.subject | Multistep derivatization | |
| dc.subject | Organic aerosol | |
| dc.subject | Oxygenated organics | |
| dc.subject | Secondary organic aerosol | |
| dc.title | Evaluation of multistep derivatization methods for identification and quantification of oxygenated species in organic aerosol | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 11 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 1 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Journal of Chromatography A | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 1418 |
