Publication:
The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma

dc.contributor.authorsTarcan T., Türkeri L., Biren T., Küllü S., Gürmen N., Akdaş A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T01:53:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T15:22:42Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T01:53:12Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.description.abstractFindings on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in local staging of prostatic carcinoma (PCa) were compared with the final pathological staging in 30 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. We found TRUS and MRI to have the same accuracy rate (53%) in local staging, whereas CT revealed a lower accuracy rate with 47%. TRUS revealed the highest accuracy rate in detecting seminal vesicle invasion with 70%, and MRI in invasion of periprostatic tissue with 67%. Although it revealed similar efficiency as MRI, TRUS should be considered as the first line modality in local staging of PCa in light of its relatively high accuracy rate, cost effectiveness and ease in performance.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF02550726
dc.identifier.issn3011623
dc.identifier.pubmed9089045
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/246291
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urology and Nephrology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.titleThe effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage779
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage773
oaire.citation.titleInternational Urology and Nephrology
oaire.citation.volume28

Files