Publication:
Dual-Phase ADC Modelling of Breast Masses in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison with Histopathologic Findings

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

AVES

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of dual-phase apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) compared to traditional ADC values in quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses. Materials and Methods: Diffusion-weighted images of pathologically confirmed 88 benign and 85 malignant lesions acquired using a 3.0T MR scanner were analyzed. Small region-of-interests focusing on the highest signal intensity of lesions were used. Lesion ADC estimates were obtained separately from all b-value images (ADC; b=50, 400 and 800s/mm(2)), lower b-value images (ADC low; b=50 and 400s/mm2) and higher b-value images (ADC(high); b=400 and 800s/mm(2)). A set of dual-phase ADC (dpADC) models were constructed using ADC low, ADC high and a perfusion influence factor ranging from 0 to 1. Results: Strong positive correlation is observable between ADC and all dpADCs (rho=0.80-1.00). Differences in ADC and dpADCs between the benign and the malignant lesions are all significant (p<0.05). In detecting malignancy, traditional lesion ADC provides a good performance (AUC=89.9%) however dpADC(0.5) (dpADC with a factor of 0.5) accomplishes a better performance (AUC=90.8%). At optimal thresholds, ADC achieves 94.1% sensitivity, 72.7% specificity and 83.2% accuracy while dpADC(0.5) leads to 92.9% sensitivity, 79.5% specificity and 86.1% accuracy. Conclusion: Dual-phase ADC modelling may improve the accuracy in breast cancer diagnosis using DWI. Further prospective studies are needed to justify its benefit in clinical setting.

Description

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By