Publication:
Is pulmonary capillary wedge pressure a reliable indicator of postcapillary pulmonary hypertension

dc.contributor.authorKOCAKAYA, DERYA
dc.contributor.authorsAslanger E., Akaslan D., Ataş H., Yıldırımtürk Ö., Öz M., Kocakaya D., Yıldızeli B., Mutlu B.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T11:05:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T11:16:55Z
dc.date.available2023-12-04T11:05:16Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-18
dc.description.abstractAlthough current pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines recommend a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) above 15 mmHg for the detection of a post-capillary component, the rational of this recommendation may not be quite compatible with the peculiar hemodynamics of PH. We hypothesize that a high PCWP alone does not necessarily indicate left-sided disease and this diagnosis can be improved using LV transmural pressure difference (∆PTM). In this two-center, retrospective, observational study; we enrolled 1070 patients with PH who had undergone heart catheterization with the final study population comprising of 961 cases. ∆PTM was calculated as PCWP minus right atrial pressure. The patients with group II PH had significantly higher ∆PTM values (12.6 ± 6.6 mmHg) compared to the other groups (1.1 ± 4.8 in group I, 12.4 ± 6.6 in group II, 2.5 ± 6.4 in group III and 0.8 ± 8.0 in group IV, P<0.001) despite overlapping PCWP values. A ∆PTM cut-off of 7 mmHg identifies left-heart disease when PCWP>15 (area under curve, 0.825; 95% confidence interval, 0.784 to. 0.866; P<0.001). Five-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with high ∆PTM and PCWP subgroup compared to low ∆PTM plus high PCWP (26.1% vs. 18.5%, P=0.027), and low ∆PTM and PCWP subgroups (26.1% vs. 15.6%, P<0.001). ∆PTM has supplementary discriminatory power in distinguishing patients with and without post-capillary PH. In conclusion, a new approach utilizing ∆PTM may improve our understanding of PH pathophysiology and may identify a subpopulation who may potentially benefit from PH-specific treatments.
dc.identifier.citationAslanger E., Akaslan D., Ataş H., Yıldırımtürk Ö., Öz M., Kocakaya D., Yıldızeli B., Mutlu B., "Is Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure a Reliable Indicator of Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension?", The American journal of cardiology, 2023
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.034
dc.identifier.issn0002-9149
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914923013243?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/295324
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe American journal of cardiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectheart failure
dc.subjecthemodynamics
dc.subjectpulmonary capillary wedge pressure
dc.subjectpulmonary vascular resistance
dc.subjectpulmonary hypertension
dc.titleIs pulmonary capillary wedge pressure a reliable indicator of postcapillary pulmonary hypertension
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format