Publication:
Nickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques.

dc.contributor.authorsErverdi N., Koyutürk O., Küçükkeles N.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T01:53:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T11:08:57Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T01:53:27Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare two intra-oral molar distalization procedures, involving 15 cases with Class II molar relationships. Magnetic devices were applied to the upper right first molars in each case, while nickel-titanium coil springs were used against the upper left first molars, for a period of 3 months. Measurements were made from lateral cephalograms and from photocopies of models taken before and after the distalization procedure. Although upper molar distalization was achieved with ease in both techniques, nickel-titanium coil springs were found to be the more effective in terms of movement achieved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ortho/24.1.47
dc.identifier.issn0301228X
dc.identifier.pubmed9088603
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/246333
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBritish journal of orthodontics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.titleNickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage53
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage47
oaire.citation.titleBritish journal of orthodontics
oaire.citation.volume24

Files