Publication:
A Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction

dc.contributor.authorGARİP, HASAN
dc.contributor.authorGÖNÜL, ONUR
dc.contributor.authorsGoktay, Ozgen; Satilmis, Tulin; Garip, Hasan; Gonul, Onur; Goker, Kamil
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:49:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T06:04:04Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the effects of fentanyl and tramadol, used in combination, as sedation for third molar surgical extraction. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 60 patients undergoing extraction of a horizontal third molar with an Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale score above 10 points. All of the patients were first given a 0.03-mg/kg bolus of midazolam, and then they were randomized into 3 groups: group A, midazolam only; group B, midazolam and 1-mu g/kg fentanyl; and group C, midazolam and 1-mg/kg tramadol. The vital signs were recorded. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain and adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction was assessed. Results: No differences were found in the heart rate among groups (P > .05). The mean blood pressure was also similar until the 40th minute, after which the mean blood pressure in the patients in group A was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P < .01). In the postoperative pain assessment, the visual analog scale scores of the patients in group C were lower than those in the other 2 groups in the first postoperative hour (P < .05). The time at which the first rescue analgesic was taken in groups A, B, and C was 3, 3.5, and 5 hours postoperatively, respectively, and was significantly later in group C (P < .01). No difference was found in patient/surgeon satisfaction among the groups. Conclusions: Tramadol has a better analgesic effect in third molar surgery than fentanyl and placebo. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1594-1599, 2011
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.005
dc.identifier.eissn1531-5053
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.pubmed21277062
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230107
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000291404000057
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectPATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION
dc.subjectPREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
dc.subjectANALGESIC EFFICACY
dc.subjectTRAMADOL
dc.subjectREMIFENTANIL
dc.subjectCOMBINATION
dc.subject3RD-MOLAR
dc.subjectRECOVERY
dc.subjectFENTANYL
dc.subjectPLACEBO
dc.titleA Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1599
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage1594
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
oaire.citation.volume69

Files