Publication: A Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction
| dc.contributor.author | GARİP, HASAN | |
| dc.contributor.author | GÖNÜL, ONUR | |
| dc.contributor.authors | Goktay, Ozgen; Satilmis, Tulin; Garip, Hasan; Gonul, Onur; Goker, Kamil | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-12T17:49:41Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-11T06:04:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-12T17:49:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of fentanyl and tramadol, used in combination, as sedation for third molar surgical extraction. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 60 patients undergoing extraction of a horizontal third molar with an Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale score above 10 points. All of the patients were first given a 0.03-mg/kg bolus of midazolam, and then they were randomized into 3 groups: group A, midazolam only; group B, midazolam and 1-mu g/kg fentanyl; and group C, midazolam and 1-mg/kg tramadol. The vital signs were recorded. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain and adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction was assessed. Results: No differences were found in the heart rate among groups (P > .05). The mean blood pressure was also similar until the 40th minute, after which the mean blood pressure in the patients in group A was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P < .01). In the postoperative pain assessment, the visual analog scale scores of the patients in group C were lower than those in the other 2 groups in the first postoperative hour (P < .05). The time at which the first rescue analgesic was taken in groups A, B, and C was 3, 3.5, and 5 hours postoperatively, respectively, and was significantly later in group C (P < .01). No difference was found in patient/surgeon satisfaction among the groups. Conclusions: Tramadol has a better analgesic effect in third molar surgery than fentanyl and placebo. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1594-1599, 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.005 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1531-5053 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0278-2391 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 21277062 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/230107 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000291404000057 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION | |
| dc.subject | PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN | |
| dc.subject | ANALGESIC EFFICACY | |
| dc.subject | TRAMADOL | |
| dc.subject | REMIFENTANIL | |
| dc.subject | COMBINATION | |
| dc.subject | 3RD-MOLAR | |
| dc.subject | RECOVERY | |
| dc.subject | FENTANYL | |
| dc.subject | PLACEBO | |
| dc.title | A Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 1599 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 6 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 1594 | |
| oaire.citation.title | JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 69 |
