Publication:
EVALUATION OF SEALING PROPERTIES OF THERMAFIL AND ULTRAFIL TECHNIQUES IN THE ABSENCE OR PRESENCE OF SMEAR LAYER

dc.contributor.authorsGENCOGLU, N; SAMANI, S; GUNDAY, M
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T16:57:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T19:44:52Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T16:57:12Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.description.abstractThe apical sealing abilities of two thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques were evaluated. A total of 128 single-rooted teeth were divided into six groups in which Ultrafil, Thermafil, and lateral condensation techniques, with and without the smear layer, were used to obturate 20 roots in each group. The roots were implanted subcutaneously in rats for 90 days to expose the materials to vital tissue and tissue fluids. The roots were recovered, immersed in 1% methylene blue for 2 wk, cleared, and the dye penetration was measured using a dissecting microscope. Thermafil showed the least leakage with smear layer present and Ultrafil the least with it absent. The two thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques both showed significantly less leakage than lateral condensation with and without the smear layer. Removing the smear layer reduced the leakage significantly in all groups.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80273-6
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.pubmed8151254
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/226898
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1993MJ90700004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectTHERMOPLASTICIZED GUTTA-PERCHA
dc.subjectOBTURATION TECHNIQUES
dc.subjectAPICAL SEAL
dc.subjectABILITY
dc.subjectREMOVAL
dc.titleEVALUATION OF SEALING PROPERTIES OF THERMAFIL AND ULTRAFIL TECHNIQUES IN THE ABSENCE OR PRESENCE OF SMEAR LAYER
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage603
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage599
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
oaire.citation.volume19

Files