Publication:
Five-Year Treatment Outcomes with Three Brands of Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures

dc.contributor.authorsAkoglu, Burcin; Ucankale, Mert; Ozkan, Yasar; Kulak-Ozkan, Yasemin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:50:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T19:01:48Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, posttreatment care, and patient satisfaction with overdenture treatment in the severely resorbed mandible. Materials and Methods: Two implants were inserted in the intraforaminal region of 36 edentulous patients. Seventy-two implants were placed: 24 ITI (Institut Straumann), 24 SwissPlus (Zimmer Dental), and 24 Astra (Astra Tech). Implants were not loaded until osseointegration was complete. Following osseointegration and insertion of the prosthesis, the implants were evaluated by clinical and radiographic parameters. Clinical parameters, including Plaque Index, Sulcus Bleeding Index, peri-implant probing depth (PD), and marginal bone loss (MBL), were recorded, and any biologic and mechanical complications at baseline and recall evaluations were noted. Patient satisfaction with mastication, phonetics, retention, oral hygiene, and esthetics was also evaluated by means of a questionnaire. The results were analyzed statistically Results: The cumulative implant survival rate after 5 years of loading was 100%. There were significant differences in mean PD values between the three implant groups at baseline and recall evaluations. Mean PD values for the Astra group were significantly higher than those for the IT! and SwissPlus groups. Although the mean MBL was within clinically acceptable levels for all groups, there were significant differences among the three groups for MBL scores between baseline and 5 years. The mean MBL for the ITI group was significantly lower than the MBL values seen for the Astra and SwissPlus groups. Over the 60-month evaluation period, the most common prosthetic complications were mandibular denture fracture and dislodgement of the female attachment. Conclusions: Mandibular implant overdenture treatment is a successful treatment modality for the severely resorbed mandible. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2011;26:188-194
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000287565500021
dc.identifier.eissn1942-4434
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.pubmed21365055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230187
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000287565500021
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectclinical evaluation
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectoverdenture
dc.subjectMULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL
dc.subjectPATIENT SATISFACTION
dc.subjectFOLLOW-UP
dc.subjectENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS
dc.subjectITI IMPLANTS
dc.subjectBALL
dc.subjectATTACHMENTS
dc.subjectIMZ
dc.titleFive-Year Treatment Outcomes with Three Brands of Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage194
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage188
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
oaire.citation.volume26

Files