Publication:
Topical Treatment of Persistent Epithelial Defects with a Matrix Regenerating Agent

dc.contributor.authorTOKER, AYŞE EBRU
dc.contributor.authorSEVİK, MEHMET ORKUN
dc.contributor.authorAKKAYA TURHAN, SEMRA
dc.contributor.authorsSevik, Mehmet Orkun; Turhan, Semra Akkaya; Toker, Ebru
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:24:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T19:31:11Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:24:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a topical regenerating agent (RGTA) for management of persistent epithelial defects (PEDs) resistant to conventional therapy. Methods: Twenty-one patients (23 eyes) with PEDs despite the use of conventional therapy for lagophthalmos (n = 4), neurotrophic ulcer (n = 9), chemical burn (n = 3), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (n = 1), atopic keratoconjunctivitis (n = 1), severe dry eye (n = 2), peripheral ulcerative keratitis (n = 1), fungal keratitis (n = 1), and bacterial keratitis (n = 1) were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with RGTA (Cacicol; Thea, Paris, France) instilled at a dosage of one drop on alternate days. Patients were evaluated by slit-lamp examination, anterior segment photography, and fluorescein-dye testing. Ulcer areas were noted on alternate days starting from the first day of instillation. Results: Twenty of 23 eyes (86.9%) displayed complete corneal healing after a mean period of similar to 7.2 days (range, 2-20 days). Mean decrease ratio of ulcer area observed was 61.2% (range, 8.8%-100%, n = 19) on the 2nd day, 74.4% (range, 36%-100%, n = 16) on the 4th day, 80.2% (range, 43.7%-100%, n = 12) on the 6th day, 88.5% (range, 55.9%-100%, n = 9) on the 8th day, and 85.5% (range, 58.3%-100%, n = 7) on the 10th day. No significant differences were found in the epithelialization speed between eyes with and without bandage contact lenses in any postoperative day (P > 0.05). There were no treatment-related local or systemic side effects during the study. Conclusions: RGTA seems to be an effective therapeutic alternative in the treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/jop.2018.0025
dc.identifier.eissn1557-7732
dc.identifier.issn1080-7683
dc.identifier.pubmed30312119
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/234788
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000447152900001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectregenerating agent
dc.subjectRGTA
dc.subjectpersistent epithelial defect
dc.subjectrecalcitrant epithelial defect
dc.subjectCacicol
dc.subjectCORNEAL CROSS-LINKING
dc.subjectTHERAPY AGENT
dc.subjectRGTA
dc.subjectSULFATE
dc.titleTopical Treatment of Persistent Epithelial Defects with a Matrix Regenerating Agent
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage627
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage621
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
oaire.citation.volume34

Files