Publication:
Efficacy of regorafenib in the second-and third-line setting for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A real life data of multicenter study from Turkey

dc.contributor.authorsHacioglu, Muhammet Bekir; Kostek, Osman; Karabulut, Senem; Tastekin, Didem; Goksu, Sema Sezgin; Alandag, Celal; Akagunduz, Baran; Bilgetekin, Irem; Caner, Burcu; Sahin, Ahmet Bilgehan; Yildiz, Birol; Kose, Fatih; Kaplan, Muhammet Ali; Gulmez, Ahmet; Dogan, Ender; Guven, Deniz Can; Gurbuz, Mustafa; Ergun, Yakup; Karaagac, Mustafa; Demiray, Atike Gokcen; Turker, Sema; Sakalar, Teoman; Ozkul, Ozlem; Telli, Tugba Akin; Sahin, Suleyman; Kilickap, Saadettin; Bilici, Ahmet; Erdogan, Bulent; Cicin, Irfan
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:54:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T16:13:09Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:54:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPurpose: After failure of the first-line sorafenib treatment in advanced or metastatic stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), regorafenib is one of the newly-approved targeted agents. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of regorafenib in patients with advanced HCC treated in the secondor third-line setting. Methods: In this retrospective and multicenter study, advanced HCC patients not eligible for local therapies, who received a secondor third-line regorafenib therapy after progression on the first-line sorafenib or sequential therapy with chemotherapy (CT) followed by sorafenib, were included. Results: In the first-line setting, 28 (28.9%) patients received CT and 69 (71.1%) patients received sorafenib. There were 24 (24.7%) patients who were intolerant to sorafenib. Disease control rate (DCR) was 53.6% for all patients treated with regorafenib, 62.3% in patients who received regorafenib in the second-line, and 32.1% for those receiving regorafenib in the third-line (p=0.007). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 (range; 4.3-6.9) and 8.8 (range, 6.3-11.3) months for all patients treated with regorafenib vs. 7.1 months and 10.3 months for patients who received regorafenib in the second-line vs. 5.1 and 8.7 months for patients who received regorafenib in the third-line, respectively; however, there was no statistically significant difference (p(PFS)=0.22 and p(OS)=0.85). Conclusion: Although receiving CT as a first-line therapy in advanced HCC patients did not affect the survival rates of subsequent regorafenib therapy, it might diminish the DCR of regorafenib.
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000573102800001
dc.identifier.eissn2241-6293
dc.identifier.issn1107-0625
dc.identifier.pubmed33099930
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/236607
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000573102800001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIMPRIMATUR PUBLICATIONS
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BUON
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjecthepatocellular carcinoma
dc.subjectregorafenib
dc.subjectdisease control rate
dc.subjectoverall survival
dc.subjectchemotherapy
dc.subjectanti-VEGF therapy
dc.subjectSORAFENIB
dc.subjectCANCER
dc.titleEfficacy of regorafenib in the second-and third-line setting for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A real life data of multicenter study from Turkey
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1903
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage1897
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF BUON
oaire.citation.volume25

Files