Publication:
The Clinical Role of LASER for Vulvar and Vaginal Treatments in Gynecology and Female Urology: An ICS/ISSVD Best Practice Consensus Document

dc.contributor.authorsPreti, Mario; Vieira-Baptista, Pedro; Digesu, Giuseppe Alessandro; Bretschneider, Carol Emi; Damaser, Margot; Demirkesen, Oktay; Heller, Debra S.; Mangir, Naside; Marchitelli, Claudia; Mourad, Sherif; Moyal-Barracco, Micheline; Peremateu, Sol; Tailor, Visha; Tarcan, Tufan; De, Elise J. B.; Stockdale, Colleen K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T10:03:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:34:20Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T10:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.description.abstractIn this best practice document, we propose recommendations for the use of LASER for gynecologic and urologic conditions such as vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence, vulvodynia, and lichen sclerosus based on a thorough literature review. Most of the available studies are limited by their design; for example, they lack a control group, patients are not randomized, follow-up is short term, series are small, LASER is not compared with standard treatments, and most studies are industry sponsored. Because of these limitations, the level of evidence for the use of LASER in the treatment of these conditions remains low and does not allow for definitive recommendations for its use in routine clinical practice. Histological evidence is commonly reported as proof of tissue regeneration after LASER treatment. However, the histological changes noted can also be consistent with reparative changes after a thermal injury rather than necessarily representing regeneration or restoration of function. The use of LASER in women with vulvodynia or lichen sclerosus should not be recommended in routine clinical practice. There is no biological plausibility or safety data on its use on this population of women. The available clinical studies do not present convincing data regarding the efficacy of LASER for the treatment of vaginal atrophy or urinary incontinence. Also, although short-term complications seem to be uncommon, data concerning long-term outcomes are lacking. Therefore, at this point, LASER is not recommended for routine treatment of the aforementioned conditions unless part of well-designed clinical trials or with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/LGT.0000000000000462
dc.identifier.eissn1526-0976
dc.identifier.issn1089-2591
dc.identifier.pubmed30789385
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/243985
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000462086200010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLASER
dc.subjectgenitourinary syndrome of menopause
dc.subjecturinary incontinence
dc.subjectvulvovaginal atrophy
dc.subjectvaginal laxity
dc.subjectlichen sclerosus
dc.subjectISSVD
dc.subjectICS
dc.subjectSTRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE
dc.subjectCARBON-DIOXIDE LASER
dc.subjectFRACTIONAL MICROABLATIVE CO2-LASER
dc.subjectERBIUM-YAG LASER
dc.subjectQUALITY-OF-LIFE
dc.subjectGENITOURINARY SYNDROME
dc.subjectLICHEN-SCLEROSUS
dc.subjectBREAST-CANCER
dc.subjectRADIOFREQUENCY TREATMENT
dc.subject2ND-GENERATION THERMOTHERAPY
dc.titleThe Clinical Role of LASER for Vulvar and Vaginal Treatments in Gynecology and Female Urology: An ICS/ISSVD Best Practice Consensus Document
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage160
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage151
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE
oaire.citation.volume23

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
398.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format