Publication:
Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implant stability in labial onlay grafted posterior mandibles: A pilot clinical study

dc.contributor.authorsOezkan, Yasar; Oezcan, Mutlu; Varol, Altan; Akoglu, Burcin; Ucankale, Mert; Basa, Selcuk
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:32:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T17:19:48Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objectives of this study were ( 1) to compare the stability, evaluated by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), of implants placed posterior mandibles augmented with autogenous bone harvested from the mandibular symphysis with that of implants placed in nongrafted edentulous posterior mandibles and ( 2) to compare peri-implant marginal bone height changes and implant failure for the 2 groups. Materials and Methods: Eight patients with thin posterior mandibular ridges (buccolingual crestal width less than 4 mm) underwent labial onlay alveolar grafting with symphyseal bone blocks 4 months prior to placement of 17 implants. Seven nongrafted patients received 18 implants in the edentulous posterior mandible; these patients served as a control group. RFA was performed the day of implant placement ( baseline), 1 month postplacement, 4 months postplacement ( after prosthesis delivery), and 12 months postloading. Peri-implant bone height changes at a level of 0.01 mm were assessed using periapical radiographs at baseline, the 1-month follow-up, and the 4-month follow-up. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate statistical differences within the groups, and t test was used to make comparisons between groups. Results: None of the patients presented postoperative complications or implant failure. Mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) was 63.0 +/- 6.0 to 70.2 +/- 3.5 for the grafted group and 64.1 +/- 4.1 ISQ to 70.1 +/- 3.9 for the nongrafted group. No significant difference was found in mean ISQ between the grafted and nongrafted groups at baseline, the 1-month follow-up, 4 months postplacement, or 12 months postloading ( P =.211, P =.873, P =.925, P =.735, respectively). Mean peri-implant bone loss was 0.16 +/- 0.04 mm mesially and 0.16 +/- 0.05 mm distally. Conclusion: RFA revealed no difference in implant stability between mandibular ridges augmented with autologous bone grafts at baseline or after loading.
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000245956800008
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.pubmed17465348
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/228730
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000245956800008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectautogenous bone graft
dc.subjectedentulous posterior mandible
dc.subjectimplant stability
dc.subjectresonance frequency analysis
dc.subjectsymphysis
dc.subjectALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION
dc.subjectILIAC BONE-GRAFTS
dc.subjectTITANIUM IMPLANTS
dc.subjectDELAYED PLACEMENT
dc.subjectANTERIOR MAXILLA
dc.subjectIN-VIVO
dc.subjectRECONSTRUCTION
dc.subjectCOMBINATION
dc.subjectRABBIT
dc.subjectINTERFACE
dc.titleResonance frequency analysis assessment of implant stability in labial onlay grafted posterior mandibles: A pilot clinical study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage242
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage235
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
oaire.citation.volume22

Files