Publication: TEK PARTİ DÖNEMİNDEKİ BAZI DİNÎ YAYINLARIN YASAKLANMA SEBEPLERİ
Abstract
Her siyasî anlayış, kendi kriterlerine uygun olmadığını düşündüğü bazı gazete, mecmua ve kitap gibi çeşitli yayınları yasaklamıştır. Tek partili yıllarda da diğer dönemlerde olduğu gibi bazı dinî muhtevalı yayınların basımı, iç ve dış siyasete uygun görülmeyerek engellenmiştir. M. Kemal Atatürk döneminde daha çok dini tahrif edici yayınlar yasaklanırken; İsmet İnönü'lü yıllarda "dua mecmuası" ve tek parti zihniyetini eleştiren kişilerin eserleri de bu tür bir akıbete maruz kalmıştır. Kurucu irade bu kararı alırken çoğu zaman Diyanet İşleri Reisliği'nin konu hakkındaki fikrine başvurmamıştır. Mezkûr dönemde yasaklanan yayınlarla ilgili kararnamelere bakıldığında ise, pek çok eserin Matbuat Kanunu'nun yanlış maddesi ile memnu kılındığı an---laşılmaktadır.
The Reasons of Prohibition of Some Religious Publications in the Single Party Era Every political understanding prohibited some publications such as newspapers, maga-­--zines and books because it perceived them as opposite to its criteria. Even during the single party years, which were the same as other terms, some religious publications were inhibited from publication by the politicians because of not being suitable for domestic and international political views. ?hen the publications distorting religion were banned in the M Kemal Ataturk's era, both "prayer magazine" and works written by those criticizedthe single-­--party mentality were under the same prohibition in the smet nonu's years. ?enerally, founding will did not consult with the eadership of Religious Affairs about the issue banning in decision-­--making process. ?hen the degrees related to the banned publications were looked at, it is understood that many works were prohibited with a wrong article of the press law.
The Reasons of Prohibition of Some Religious Publications in the Single Party Era Every political understanding prohibited some publications such as newspapers, maga-­--zines and books because it perceived them as opposite to its criteria. Even during the single party years, which were the same as other terms, some religious publications were inhibited from publication by the politicians because of not being suitable for domestic and international political views. ?hen the publications distorting religion were banned in the M Kemal Ataturk's era, both "prayer magazine" and works written by those criticizedthe single-­--party mentality were under the same prohibition in the smet nonu's years. ?enerally, founding will did not consult with the eadership of Religious Affairs about the issue banning in decision-­--making process. ?hen the degrees related to the banned publications were looked at, it is understood that many works were prohibited with a wrong article of the press law.