Publication:
Why is it (Un-)ethical? Comparing potential European partners: A western Christian and an eastern Islamic country - On arguments used in explaining ethical judgments

dc.contributor.authorARZOVA, SABRİ BURAK
dc.contributor.authorsSrnka, Katharina J.; Gegez, A. Ercan; Arzova, S. Burak
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T15:25:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T13:44:21Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T15:25:01Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractLocated at the crossroads of the Eastern and Western world, Turkey today is characterized by a demographically versatile and modernizing society as well as a rapidly developing economy. Currently, the country is negotiating its accession to the European Union. This article yields some factual grounding into the ongoing value-related debate concerning Turkey's potential EU-membership. It describes a mixed-methodology study on moral reasoning in Austria and Turkey. In this study, the arguments given by individuals when evaluating ethically problematic situations in business were compared. Although there were major consistencies, a number of differences were found. These differences, however, were not in the substance (categories) of arguments used but in their relative frequency. Overall, our findings suggest that young, well-educated urban individuals from Western Christian and Eastern Islamic countries are highly consistent in their moral reasoning.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-006-9223-1
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0697
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/220068
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000248417100001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectcross-cultural comparison
dc.subjectmoral reasoning
dc.subjectempirical study
dc.subjectmixed methodology
dc.subjectCONSUMER ETHICS
dc.subjectBUSINESS ETHICS
dc.subjectDECISION-MAKING
dc.subjectORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT
dc.subjectUNITED-STATES
dc.subjectATTITUDES
dc.subjectBELIEFS
dc.subjectCULTURE
dc.subjectVALUES
dc.subjectSALESPEOPLE
dc.titleWhy is it (Un-)ethical? Comparing potential European partners: A western Christian and an eastern Islamic country - On arguments used in explaining ethical judgments
dc.typereview
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage118
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage101
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
oaire.citation.volume74

Files