Publication:
Do Platform Switching Together with Subcrestal Placement have a Benefit on Marginal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKURU, LEYLA
dc.contributor.authorsAgrali, Omer Birkan; Elemek, Eser; Dincer, Janberd; Kigili, Ahmet; Cilingir, Altug; Kuru, Leyla; Almas, Khalid
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:26:23Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the marginal bone levels around platform-switched dental implants placed subcrestally in partially or totally edentulous patients who had been treated in a private practice. Methods: A total of 200 implants placed in 64 patients, with a mean follow-up time of 5.3 +/- 1.7 years, were included in the study. Implants were placed 0.5 mm subcrestally via one-or two-stage surgical approach. Data regarding the distribution and diameter of the implants, the type of the prosthetic restoration, and marginal bone levels were assessed by one calibrated examiner. Results: Overall, the mean marginal bone loss was found to be 0.82 +/- 1.6 mm, and 66% of the implants (n=81) showed no bone loss, whereas 28% (n=35) showed bone loss >1mm, and 20% (n=25) showed bone loss >2mm. Out of 18 implants in use for 1-3 years, 14 of them showed no bone loss. Among implants that were in function for 3-5 years, 25% (n=15) showed bone loss >1mm, and 12% (n=7) showed bone loss >2mm. In this study, the majority of the implants were in use for more than 5 years (n=122). Out of them, 66% (n=81) showed no bone loss, whereas 28% (n=35) showed bone loss >1 mm, and 20% (n=25) showed bone loss >2mm. Conclusion: Within the limits of this retrospective study, one can say that slight amount of marginal bone loss is observed around the platform-switched implants placed subcrestally in a long-term follow-up. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/clinexphealthsci.2017.447
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/235057
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000438242200002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAVES PRESS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBone level
dc.subjectdental implant
dc.subjectplatform switch
dc.subjectsubcrestal placement
dc.subjectFOLLOW-UP
dc.subjectPREVALENCE
dc.subjectSURVIVAL
dc.subjectDISEASES
dc.subjectSUCCESS
dc.subjectSURGERY
dc.subjectTRIAL
dc.titleDo Platform Switching Together with Subcrestal Placement have a Benefit on Marginal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id96b9c20f-4b49-43d2-8233-fa343500509c
local.import.packageSS17
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atTRDIZIN
local.journal.numberofpages5
oaire.citation.endPage84
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage80
oaire.citation.titleCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
oaire.citation.volume8
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcc49fe59-fb00-4a6a-a32c-60d68c5f3993
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycc49fe59-fb00-4a6a-a32c-60d68c5f3993

Files

Collections

Research Outputs