Publication:
Native tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorYOLDEMİR, AHMET TEVFİK
dc.contributor.authorsKalkan, U.; Yoldemir, T.; Ozyurek, E. S.; Daniilidis, A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T15:25:25Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T15:25:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractIn pelvic organ prolapse, the anatomical defects develop at the anterior (anterior vaginal wall), the posterior (posterior vaginal wall) and the apical (the uterus/cervix or the apex of the vagina, vaginal vault or cuff scar after hysterectomy) compartments. These defects occur in more than one compartment. Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse is commonly surgical, aiming to restore the anatomy of structures supporting the pelvic organs. The surgical repair techniques are classified as native tissue repair (NTR)' when only pelvic organ support tissues are used and augmented repair (AR)' when some other material (prosthesis or graft) is used to reinforce the defective support system. In this review, issues related to the basic science of meshes, and NTR versus mesh or graft AR procedures for pelvic organ prolapse are discussed while considering the varying risks and benefits according to the prolapsed compartment.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13697137.2017.1366978
dc.identifier.eissn1473-0804
dc.identifier.issn1369-7137
dc.identifier.pubmed28872932
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/220241
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000415755200003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofCLIMACTERIC
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectNative tissue repair
dc.subjectmesh repair
dc.subjectpelvic organ prolapse surgery
dc.subjectVAGINAL WALL PROLAPSE
dc.subjectSTRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE
dc.subjectPROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
dc.subjectCOATED TRANSVAGINAL MESH
dc.subjectANTERIOR COLPORRHAPHY
dc.subjectRISK-FACTORS
dc.subjectPOLYPROPYLENE MESH
dc.subjectFASCIA LATA
dc.subjectRECTOCELE REPAIR
dc.subjectRECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
dc.titleNative tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
dc.typereview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id548d2865-a911-4012-a6b0-a573c660cca9
local.import.packageSS5
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atSCOPUS
local.indexed.atPUBMED
local.journal.numberofpages8
local.journal.quartileQ1
oaire.citation.endPage517
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage510
oaire.citation.titleCLIMACTERIC
oaire.citation.volume20
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa83f8663-e08c-4cde-a28b-fbd444a689e0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya83f8663-e08c-4cde-a28b-fbd444a689e0

Files

Collections

Research Outputs