Publication: İptalle Gelen Sorun: Reformdan Geriye Ne Kaldı? Anayasa Mahkemesi'Nin 15.12.2006 Tarihli Kararına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme
Abstract
1.1.2007 tarihinde yürürlüğe girmesi öngörülen, 5510 sayılı Sosyal Sigortalar ve Genel Sağlık Sigortası Yasası’ nın bazı hükümlerinin Anayasa’ya aykırılığı ileri sürülerek iptalleri ve yürürlüklerinin durdurulması amacıyla Cumhurbaşkanı ve 118 Milletvekili tarafından dava açılmıştır. Anayasa Mahkemesi de, 5510 sayılı Yasa’nın bazı hükümlerini Anayasa’ya aykırı bulmuş ve iptal etmiştir. Özellikle kamu görevlileri ile ilgili hükümleri Anayasa’nın 2, 10 ve 128. maddelerine aykırı bularak iptal etmiş ve kamu görevlilerinin emeklilikleri ile sağlık işlemlerinin ayrı bir yasayla düzenlenmesi gerektiğine hükmetmiştir. 5510 sayılı Yasa’nın yürürlüğe girmesiyle birlikte yürürlükten kaldırılması öngörülen, 5434 sayılı T.C. Emekli Sandığı Yasası, iptal kararından sonra yürürlüğünü sürdürmeye devam edecektir. Bu makalede, Sosyal Güvenlik Sisteminde yapılması öngörülen reformun amaçları ile Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin iptal kararı sonrasındaki reformun görünümü değerlendirilmektedir.
President of the republic and 118 deputies of the National Grand Assembly brought an action before the Constitutional Court alleging that some articles of the Social Insurance and General Health Insurance Act No. 5510 were contrary to the Constitution. Therefore, they demanded that the enforcement of these articles should have been stopped and they should have been cancelled. The Constitutional Court reached a decision by which certain articles of the Act were held to be contrary to the Constitution. Thus the disputed articles were cancelled. In particular the articles concerning public servants were cancelled due to their violation of articles 2., 10. and 128. of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court emphasized that the retirement and health care of public servants should have been seperately regulated.The Retirement Funds Act No. 5434 shall be in force after the Cancellation decision as before. Within this article, the goals of the social security reform and the insight following the decision of the Constitutional Court will be examined.
President of the republic and 118 deputies of the National Grand Assembly brought an action before the Constitutional Court alleging that some articles of the Social Insurance and General Health Insurance Act No. 5510 were contrary to the Constitution. Therefore, they demanded that the enforcement of these articles should have been stopped and they should have been cancelled. The Constitutional Court reached a decision by which certain articles of the Act were held to be contrary to the Constitution. Thus the disputed articles were cancelled. In particular the articles concerning public servants were cancelled due to their violation of articles 2., 10. and 128. of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court emphasized that the retirement and health care of public servants should have been seperately regulated.The Retirement Funds Act No. 5434 shall be in force after the Cancellation decision as before. Within this article, the goals of the social security reform and the insight following the decision of the Constitutional Court will be examined.