Publication: Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Composites Luted with Three New Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin
dc.contributor.author | TÜRKMEN, CAFER | |
dc.contributor.authors | Tuerkmen, Cafer; Durkan, Meral; Oksuz, Mustafa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-12T17:37:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-12T17:37:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of indirect composites (those cured outside the mouth) luted by three different, recently developed, self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Seventy caries-free mandibular third molar teeth embedded in acrylic resin and with exposed dentin surfaces were used. Teeth were randomly divided into seven groups. The following application protocols were carried out: a) Group 1 (control group)direct composite resin restoration (Alert) with total-etch adhesive system (Bond 1 primer/adhesive); b) Group 2indirect composite restoration (Estenia) luted by a resin cement (Cement-It) combined with the same total-etch adhesive; c) Group 3direct composite resin restoration with self-etch adhesive system (Nano-Bond); d) Group 4indirect composite restoration luted by the resin cement combined with the same self-etch adhesive; e) Groups 5-7indirect composite restoration luted with self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem (R), Maxcem (R), and Embrace WetBond (R), respectively) onto untreated dentin surfaces. Shear bond strengths of the groups were performed with a universal testing device. Results were statistically analysed by student-t and one way ANOVA tests. The fractured surfaces were also examined by SEM. The indirect composite restorations luted with the self-adhesive resin cements (Groups 5-7) showed successful results compared with the other groups (p0.05). Group 4 showed the weakest bond strength (p0.05). Open dentin tubules were observed on the total-etch adhesive applied surfaces whereas a smear rich layer was found by SEM on the self-etch adhesive applied surfaces. The new universal self-adhesive resins may be considered an alternative for luting the indirect composite restorations onto the untreated dentin surfaces. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00218460903307779 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-8464 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/229348 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000272208800003 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF ADHESION | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Bond strength | |
dc.subject | Dentin | |
dc.subject | Indirect composite | |
dc.subject | Resin cement | |
dc.subject | Self-adhesive resin | |
dc.subject | IN-VITRO | |
dc.subject | LUTING AGENTS | |
dc.subject | ENAMEL | |
dc.subject | MICROLEAKAGE | |
dc.subject | RESTORATIONS | |
dc.subject | DEGRADATION | |
dc.subject | SYSTEMS | |
dc.title | Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Composites Luted with Three New Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin | |
dc.type | article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.avesis.id | b9278ac5-9b95-442f-a589-b0ca8b542ecd | |
local.import.package | SS17 | |
local.indexed.at | WOS | |
local.indexed.at | SCOPUS | |
local.journal.articlenumber | PII 917032636 | |
local.journal.numberofpages | 13 | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 931 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 12 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 919 | |
oaire.citation.title | JOURNAL OF ADHESION | |
oaire.citation.volume | 85 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 61fc1b04-2603-4d89-af82-a07e3db049c1 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 61fc1b04-2603-4d89-af82-a07e3db049c1 |