Publication:
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlation with Prognostic Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR

dc.contributor.authorKAYA, HANDAN
dc.contributor.authorUĞURLU, MUSTAFA ÜMİT
dc.contributor.authorsAkin, Yasin; Ugurlu, M. Umit; Kaya, Handan; Aribal, Erkin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T08:13:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T15:10:57Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T08:13:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-13
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, histopathologic subtypes of breast tumors, and to find a correlation with prognostic factors using 3T MR. Materials and Methods: A total of 165 patients aged between 16 and 78 years with 181 histopathologically-verifed breast lesions were enrolled in this study. A 3T MR system and bilateral phased array breast coil was used. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed with spin echo echo planar'' with b'' values: 50, 400, and 800 seconds/mm(2). ADC values were calculated for normal fibroglandular tissue and breast lesions. ADC values of independent groups were compared using Student's t-test. ROC analysis was used to find a threshold ADC value in the differentiation of lesions. Results: The mean ADC values were 1.35 +/- 0.16 x10(-3) mm(2)/s for normal fibroglandular tissue, 1.41 +/- 0.24 x10(-3) mm(2)/s for benign breast lesions and 0.83 +/- 0.19 x10(-3) mm(2)/s for malignant breast lesions. The AUC with ROC analysis was 0.945 and the threshold for ADC was 1.08 x10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 92%, respectively. The threshold value for ADC ratio was 0.9 with 96% sensitivity and 89% specificity. The mean ADC of malignant breast lesions was statistically lower for benign lesions (p<0.01). We found no correlation between the mean ADC values and ER-PR receptor, Her2, and Ki-67 values. Conclusion: Diffusion-weighted imaging has high diagnostic value with high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tjbh.2016.2897
dc.identifier.issn2149-1976
dc.identifier.pubmed28331748
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/241143
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382992100006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAVES
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDiffusion-weighted imaging
dc.subjectADC
dc.subjectbreast cancer
dc.subjectinvasive ductal carcinoma
dc.subjectKi-67
dc.subjectHer 2 expression
dc.subjectINVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA
dc.subjectSIGNAL INTENSITY
dc.subjectCANCER
dc.subjectRECEPTOR
dc.titleDiagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlation with Prognostic Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage132
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage123
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH
oaire.citation.volume12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
931.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format