Publication:
Assessment of Different Imaging Systems for Dental Plaque Scoring: an in-vivo study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMEŞELİ, SİMGE
dc.contributor.authorEKENEL, SERGEN
dc.contributor.authorAKSU, MEHMET BURAK
dc.contributor.authorYANIKOĞLU, FUNDA
dc.contributor.authorTAĞTEKİN, DİLEK
dc.contributor.authorsMEŞELİ S., EKENEL S., AKSU M. B., TAĞTEKİN D., YANIKOĞLU F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T08:37:13Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T08:37:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-13
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the clinical study was to analyze the correlation between the dental plaque scores measuredby different imaging systems.Materials and Methods: Thirty volunteers between the age of 18-30, who visited Marmara University, Facultyof Dentistry whose DMFT scores were under 4, were included in the study. Dental plaque on anterior teeth’sbuccal surfaces of the volunteers were scored using different imaging systems after staining with a disclosinggel. The patients were divided into three groups. The groups were given two different herbal toothpastes(ginger and hemp) and a conventional toothpaste. Digital photography, intraoral digital scanning (iTeroElements 2) and FluoreCam were used for taking intraoral images. The Turesky Modified Quigley Hein PlaqueIndex (TMQHPI) was used for the clinical examination and the taken images. The correlations between theclinical examination and imaging scores were analyzed before and after using the toothpastes for 21 days.Shapiro Wilk Test and Pearson’s correlation were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics V23 (IBM Co. , Armonk,USA) (p<0.05).Results: The lowest mean value was obtained in the clinical examination without disclosing gel method andthe highest mean value was obtained in the FluoreCam method. The mean value of the clinical examinationwithout disclosing gel was found to be lower than the clinical examination with disclosing gel method andintraoral digital scanning method. There was no significant difference between toothpastes before and aftertoothbrushing for all clinical imaging methods.Conclusion: Staining of the plaque and the use of digital imaging systems have shown a positive effect inthe determination of dental plaque. Intraoral imaging systems may be used as an alternative to supplementthe shortcomings of conventional clinical indices for educating patients about plaque control and continuedpatient oral care. Herbal toothpastes are just as effective as conventional toothpastes in removing dentalplaque.
dc.identifier.citationMEŞELİ S., EKENEL S., AKSU M. B., TAĞTEKİN D., YANIKOĞLU F., \"Assessment of Different Imaging Systems for Dental Plaque Scoring: an in-vivo Study \", 11th Conseuro, Antalya, Türkiye, 23 Nisan 2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.marmara.edu.tr/api/publication/c61a7566-dd7b-45e4-92d2-2af33fd0578f/file
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/290242
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartof11th Conseuro
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectKlinik Bilimler
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectClinical Sciences
dc.subjectNatural Sciences
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (MED)
dc.subjectCLINICAL MEDICINE
dc.subjectDENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
dc.subjectOrtodonti
dc.subjectAğız Cerrahisi
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği (çeşitli)
dc.subjectDiş Hijyeni
dc.subjectPeriodontoloji
dc.subjectDişçilik Hizmetleri
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectOral Surgery
dc.subjectDentistry (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectDental Hygiene
dc.subjectPeriodontics
dc.subjectDental Assisting
dc.subjectGeneral Dentistry
dc.titleAssessment of Different Imaging Systems for Dental Plaque Scoring: an in-vivo study
dc.typeconferenceObject
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.idc61a7566-dd7b-45e4-92d2-2af33fd0578f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0787b932-3fdd-4e9b-a612-989c02047ca9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1b3be067-9162-4e3d-80b1-4f85daa87b90
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7de5699-7a5c-4496-93cf-d8daba79da4f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication455f3984-3ed8-491e-a0b9-5b5f066bead3
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdd30c5b5-8566-42e3-8ec7-94f6ed25fdcc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0787b932-3fdd-4e9b-a612-989c02047ca9

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
14.pdf
Size:
681.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Outputs