Publication:
CFD analysis and comparison of conventional type and perforated plate type shell tube heat exchangers

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorİNAN, AHMET TALAT
dc.contributor.authorsİnan A. T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T16:21:58Z
dc.date.available2022-12-26T16:21:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-01
dc.description.abstractAbstractThe baffle plate is the most important elements affecting not only the thermal efficiency but also the hydraulic performance of shell-tube heat exchangers that can be designed in different types today and can be put into the production phase. Different designs of baffle plates are closely related to thermal performance with pressure drop as well. In this investigation, the design geometry of the shell-tube type was carried out by means of the ANSYS Fluent program.In the analyses, it is purposed to examine the consequences on the heat transfer rate per drop of pressure and not only the pressure’s drop but also the coefficient parameter of heat transfer of the exchangers in which traditional one-piece type baffle plate and perforated type baffle plate are used where the shell side. Here, water is used as the working fluid; it was examined as 1.2, 1.5, 1.8 and 2.1kg/h at four varied mass flow rates (m). As a result, the values compared to the traditional one-piece baffle plate and the perforated type baffle plate. It has been monitored that the heat transfer rates per drop of pressure vary
dc.identifier.citationİnan A. T. , "CFD analysis and comparison of conventional type and perforated plate type shell tube heat exchangers", International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, sa.17, ss.1280-1292, 2022
dc.identifier.endpage1292
dc.identifier.issn1748-1317
dc.identifier.issue17
dc.identifier.startpage1280
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.marmara.edu.tr/api/publication/5ca38ec2-0749-43db-9f49-636d2f87a66e/file
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/284099
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMakina Mühendisliği
dc.subjectEnerji
dc.subjectDiğer
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectOther
dc.subjectEngineering and Technology
dc.subjectMühendislik, Bilişim ve Teknoloji (ENG)
dc.subjectMühendislik
dc.subjectMÜHENDİSLİK, MEKANİK
dc.subjectENERJİ VE YAKITLAR
dc.subjectEngineering, Computing & Technology (ENG)
dc.subjectENGINEERING
dc.subjectENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
dc.subjectENERGY & FUELS
dc.subjectMakine Mühendisliği
dc.subjectHesaplamalı Mekanik
dc.subjectOtomotiv Mühendisliği
dc.subjectYenilenebilir Enerji, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Çevre
dc.subjectYakıt Teknolojisi
dc.subjectEnerji Mühendisliği ve Güç Teknolojisi
dc.subjectEnerji (çeşitli)
dc.subjectGenel Enerji
dc.subjectFizik Bilimleri
dc.subjectComputational Mechanics
dc.subjectAutomotive Engineering
dc.subjectRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
dc.subjectFuel Technology
dc.subjectEnergy Engineering and Power Technology
dc.subjectEnergy (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Energy
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.titleCFD analysis and comparison of conventional type and perforated plate type shell tube heat exchangers
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id5ca38ec2-0749-43db-9f49-636d2f87a66e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication523a8f6a-88ba-46c7-9bc5-8bbab957b2c5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery523a8f6a-88ba-46c7-9bc5-8bbab957b2c5

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Outputs